THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION | Disclose Plans and Policies Aligned with Achieving Racial Equality

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
SCHW
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Schwab publish a report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, disclosing the Company’s plan to promote racial justice, if any.
Whereas clause
Following George Floyd’s murder by police officers on May 25, 2020, a majority of Russell 1000 corporations made public statements expressing their plans to address racial justice, thereby taking the first step to becoming antiracist organizations. Antiracism is the practice of identifying, challenging, and changing the values, structures, and behaviors perpetuating systemic racism. While Charles Schwab, Inc. released a statement, it did not meet many of the key terms referenced in a recent Racial Justice Scorecard. A McKinsey study cites material corporate benefits associated with corporate policies promoting racial justice: • Companies with the strongest racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to outperform their industry medians for earnings before interest and tax • Companies with the most ethnically/ culturally diverse boards are 43% more likely to earn higher profits • For every 10% increase in racial and ethnic diversity among senior executives, EBIT rises 0.8. In contrast, failure to adopt inclusion practices translates into a loss of customers and reduces profitability. Yet, inequities in the workplace continue: • People of Color comprise 33% of entry level positions, but 13% of the C-suite • Among the Russell 3000, in 2019 Black individuals accounted for 4.1% of board members versus 13.4% of the U.S. population. Schwab is falling behind peers in its racial justice policies. Schwab earned a score of only 9 percent on a recent Racial Justice Scorecard. Schwab’s 9% score ranks significantly below that of Bank of America and U.S Bancorp which scored 22% and 39%, respectively. Schwab’s low score is due to a weak initial racial justice statement; lack of publicly accessible diversity, equity, and inclusion targets; and lack of disclosed data concerning recruitment, retention, and promotion rates of people of color within the Company. Given heightened awareness around racism, failing to act on racial justice and disclose related policies and quantifiable data raises the material risk of revenue loss and reduced brand value. Schwab can reduce this risk and begin playing a critical role in ending systemic racism by promoting racial justice within our firm.
Supporting statement
Investors seek quantitative, comparable data to understand if and how the Company is promoting a commitment to Racial Justice. Proponents suggest the report include: • Policies the company could adopt to promote Racial Justice in its corporate workplaces and operations • Detailed quantitative information on diversity, equity, and inclusion, including recruitment, retention, and promotion rates and policies for people of color within the Company • Any plans to improve scores on key performance indicators on the above referenced Racial Justice scorecard

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.