CHEVRON CORPORATION | Direct Methane Measurement at Chevron Corp.

AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
Resolution details
Company ticker
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate Change
Company sector
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board oversee the preparation of a report analyzing a critical climate change concern, the reliability of Chevron’s methane emission disclosures. The report should: • summarize the outcome of any efforts to directly measure methane emissions by the Company; • provide investors with insight as to whether there is likely to be a material difference between direct measurement results and the Company’s published estimates of methane emissions; • assess the degree to which any differences would alter estimates of the Company’s Scope 1 emissions. The report should be made public, omit proprietary information and be prepared expeditiously at reasonable cost.
Whereas clause
At least a quarter of today’s global warming is caused by methane emissions from human sources.1 Methane is 86 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period, meaning reducing emissions now can buy valuable time to address the climate crisis. In 2019, 30% of U.S. methane emissions from human activities came from natural gas and petroleum systems, from venting, flaring, and leaking.2 Methane emissions can be quantified directly through measurement (e.g., by detector, drone or satellite), or indirectly through calculations and modeling. However, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) formula used to estimate methane emissions is not a good foundation for a corporate mitigation strategy, failing to capture many major leaks, wasting valuable product (worth $2 billion per year) and substantially underestimating emissions.3 Studies have found actual emissions to be between 50 and 90% higher than estimated emissions reported using the formula.4 In certain basins, studies have found emissions to be more than 10 times higher than industry disclosed figures.5 As a result, oil and gas industry Scope 1 emissions may be significantly higher than currently reported. Companies that do not manage methane emissions jeopardize other industry decarbonization efforts, and risk their reputation and license to operate, as investors, regulators and civil society are setting expectations to address this issue. In 2021, investors managing more than $5.35 trillion supported strong federal methane regulations.6 The U.S. joined the Global Methane Pledge, committing to using best available inventory methodologies to quantify methane emissions.7 Companies, including U.S. companies EQT and Jonah Energy, have joined the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership, committing to improving methane data quality and consistency.8 According to EPA data, Chevron ranks 73d of U.S. top 100 oil and gas producers, with a methane intensity of 0.08%.9 However, given the limitations of EPA’s methodology this ranking lacks credibility.
Supporting statement
At management’s discretion, we recommend that the report: • Provide a narrative explanation of the difference between the Company’s estimated methane emissions and the Company’s own direct measurements, or any third party measurements, by site or region; • Describe any efforts to validate emissions estimates and disclosure through a third-party audit or evaluation.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Foundation For
KBI Global Investors For