The Travelers Companies, Inc. (Co.) | Racial Justice Audit at The Travelers Companies

Status
47.17% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
TRV
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders urge the board of directors to oversee a third-party audit (within a reasonable time and at a reasonable cost) which assesses and produces recommendations for improving the racial impacts of its policies, practices, products, and services, above and beyond legal and regulatory matters. Input from stakeholders, including civil rights organizations, employees, and customers, should be considered in determining the specific matters to be assessed. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential/proprietary information, should be published on the company’s website.
Whereas clause
To combat systemic racism, corporations should recognize and remedy industry- and company-specific barriers to everyone’s full inclusion in societal and economic participation. Racial gaps cost the U.S. economy an estimated $16 trillion over the past twenty years. Closing the Black- and Hispanic-white wealth gaps could add 4-6% to American GDP by 2028.

One year after many companies made commitments to racial justice, the practical outcomes remain unclear. Fifty corporate pledges totaling $49.5 billion were characterized by a 2021 analysis as falling short of addressing systemic racism. Shareholders lack independent assessments that racial equity strategies are impactful, address appropriate topics, and unlock growth.

Addressing racism and its economic costs demands more than reliance on internal action and assessment. Audits engage companies in a process that internal actions may not replicate, unlocking value and uncovering blind spots that companies may have to their policies and practices. Company leaders are not diversity, equity, and inclusion experts and lack objectivity. Crucially, a racial justice audit examines the external impact a company has on minority communities.

Given companies across sectors are embroiled in race-related controversies, any company without a third-party audit and plan for improvement of internal and external racial impacts could be at risk. Companies like Facebook, Starbucks, and Blackrock have committed to such audits, and guidelines have been developed by practitioners.

Despite national reforms, auto and homeowners’ insurance policies are still differently applied to minority policyholders. An investigation found insurance companies charged higher premiums by up to 30 percent in minority communities versus whiter communities despite similar accident costs. In 2018, Travelers settled a National Fair Housing Alliance lawsuit alleging that Travelers denied insurance to landlords renting to Section 8 voucher recipients, who are predominantly Black women. In 2020, Travelers generated 34.2 percent of revenue from personal home and auto insurance. Shareholders are concerned there may be gaps between the company’s non-discriminatory business practice policy and actual outcomes, and that a racial justice audit covering both vendor relationships and insurance products may help the company identify and close potential gaps. Additionally, Travelers provides law enforcement liability insurance. In this pivotal role, the company may be at risk for contributing to systemic racism, but also may provide solutions.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.