NVIDIA CORPORATION | Customer Due Diligence at NVIDIA CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NVDA
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Conflict and/or violence
  • Human rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors commission an independent third-party report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, on NVIDIA Corporation’s (NVIDIA) customer due diligence process to determine whether customers’ use of its products or services with surveillance technology and artificial intelligence (AI) capability or of its components that support autonomous military and police vehicles, contributes to human rights harms.
Whereas clause
NVIDIA’s Code of Conduct commits the company to, complying with all applicable laws; respect internationally recognized human rights where we operate and not engaging in ... forced, bonded, or indentured labor; 1 Human rights risks are acute in conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRA), characterized by widespread human rights abuses and violations of national or international law.2 Surveillance technologies and autonomous vehicles are associated with human rights and material risks, as evidenced by stakeholder efforts to limit, place moratoriums on, and/or ban certain products and services; NVIDIA is providing products and services to customers in CAHRA that are contributing to human rights harms, including: • Selling microchips to Urumqi Cloud Center in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, used by the Chinese government to surveil, detain, and force into labor, ethnic Uyghurs;3 • Partnering with and investing in AnyVision, whose facial recognition technology is used to surveil Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem;4 • Building an AI and deep learning cloud infrastructure with Saudi Telecom Company, implicated in the surveillance and detention of human rights defenders in Saudi Arabia;5,6 and, • Partnering with the U.S. Department of Defense to accelerate the adoption of fully autonomous military vehicles;7,8 Human rights and conflict are material risks. According to US SIF’s 2020 Trends Report, conflict risk was the leading environmental, social, and governance criterion among investors representing over $6 trillion in assets under management.9 Companies have mitigated the risks of surveillance technologies, including Microsoft’s divestment from AnyVision and exit from the facial recognition market10 and Amazon’s moratorium on police using its Rekognition software;11 Policymakers are responding to risks with regulation, legislation, and public calls, including American states and cities limiting or banning the use of facial recognition by police,12 U.S. Presidential executive orders prohibiting investment in Chinese surveillance companies,13 and the European Union’s Dual Use Regulation14 and Artificial Intelligence Act;15 To mitigate risks associated with customer conduct, leading companies conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) due diligence. The process helps determine if a company’s products and services may be used to facilitate human rights harms. In November 2021, the Atlantic Council recommended the United States and NATO develop KYC policies for companies in the surveillance industry.16
Supporting statement
Shareholders seek information, at board and management discretion, through a report that: • Discusses how human rights risks in CAHRA are identified, assessed, prevented, and mitigated; and • Assesses if a customer due diligence process is needed to address these risks.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.