THE HOME DEPOT, INC. | Report on deforestation at THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

Status
64.66% votes in favour
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
HD
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Biodiversity / nature
  • Land use inc. deforestation
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request Home Depot issue a report assessing if and how it could increase the scale, pace, and rigor of its efforts to eliminate deforestation and the degradation of primary forests in its supply chains.
Whereas clause
The Home Depot is the world's largest home improvement retailer and a major purchaser of wood products. Wood products are among the leading drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, which are responsible for approximately 12.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to biodiversity loss. Companies that do not adequately mitigate deforestation and forest degradation in their supply chains are vulnerable to material climate and reputational risks.
Approximately 86 percent of Home Depot’s wood comes from North America, including from Canada’s boreal forest. Boreal forests stabilize the climate and harbor biodiversity, holding approximately 44 percent of all terrestrial carbon. Canada’s boreal, which constitutes 25 percent of the world’s remaining intact forest and stores twice as much carbon per hectare as tropical forests, experiences the third highest rate of intact forest loss globally, releasing tens of millions of metric tons of carbon annually. Demand for wood products is a primary driver of Canadian forest clearance.
Home Depot’s forest policies do not meaningfully address impacts on primary forests. Home Depot does not report to CDP Forests or comprehensively disclose the sourcing geographies and certifications of its wood products. Further, Home Depot has not committed to ensuring that its purchased wood is free of deforestation and forest degradation. The company also lacks comprehensive commitments to achieving third-party certification for purchased wood products, requiring certification only for wood products from a small subset of the regions at highest risk for deforestation.
These policies position Home Depot behind peers like Lowe’s, which has reported to CDP Forests since 2017. Lowe’s has committed to achieving 100 percent certification or controlled sourcing of wood products by 2025, and committed to achieving Forest Stewardship Council certification for wood products sourced from a more extensive list of regions at risk. Further, Lowe’s has committed to sourcing wood that “does not come from deforestation or other ecosystem conversion.”
In its 2020 10-K, Home Depot acknowledges reputational damage could materially impact company finances, and notes that the company’s position on environmental issues “could harm our reputation.” Failure to adopt and implement policies that mitigate these exposures may subject the company to significant systemic and company-specific risks.
Supporting statement
Proponents defer to management’s discretion but suggest that indicators meaningful to shareholders may include assessment of:
•Whether the company has adopted a no-deforestation and no-degradation policy for all relevant commodities, such as avoiding all primary forests and regions at high risk for deforestation and degradation; and
•Disclosure of comprehensive forest footprint and progress toward more ambitious efforts, such as quantitative progress reports, time-bound action plans, due diligence activities, and non-compliance protocols.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.