The Travelers Companies, Inc. (Co.) | Fossil Fuels Supplies disclosure at The Travelers Companies, Inc. (Co.)

Status
13.23% votes in favour
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
TRV
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Fossil fuel financing
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Travelers’ Board of Directors adopt and disclose new policies to help ensure that its underwriting practices do not support new fossil fuel supplies, in alignment with the IEA’s Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that global emissions must reach net zero by 2050 in order to limit global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2100. Both the IPCC and the International Energy Agency (IEA) agree that emissions from burning fossil fuels are the primary driver of climate change. Yet, according to the UN Environment Programme, the world is on track to produce more than double the amount of coal, oil and gas by 2030 that would be allowed under a 1.5 degrees Celsius scenario.
Recently, the IEA issued a report detailing a pathway by which the energy sector can transition to net zero emissions by 2050. Regarding expansion of fossil fuel operations, it states that, “Beyond projects already committed as of 2021, there are no new oil and gas fields approved for development in our pathway, and no new coal mines or mine extensions are required” to ensure stable and affordable energy supplies.
Property and casualty insurers are uniquely exposed to climate risks because they underwrite policies for and invest in the fossil fuel industry, which is annually responsible for approximately 90% of global carbon dioxide emissions. At the same time, insurers, such as The Travelers Companies, Inc. (Travelers), are protecting their customers’ homes and businesses from the impacts of climate-driven catastrophes.
Investors have limited insight into the cause of the strategic misalignment of Travelers’ underwriting practices. The Company has made no public commitment to limit its underwriting - even for the highest-emitting fuel, coal, and lags behind European peers, such as AXA, Allianz, Aviva, Generali, Munich Re, SCOR, Swiss Re, and Zurich. These insurers founded the Net Zero Insurance Alliance and have committed to transitioning their underwriting portfolios to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
To develop a credible net zero commitment, the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative suggests that financial institutions, including insurers engaged in underwriting, “begin aligning with the required assumptions and implications of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 1.5 degrees Celsius no / low overshoot pathways as soon as possible.” Further, “All no / low overshoot scenarios indicate an immediate reduction in fossil fuels, signaling that investment in new fossil fuel development is not aligned with 1.5 degrees Celsius.”
Supporting statement
The board and management, at its discretion, should define the scope, time frames and parameters of the policy, including defining “new fossil fuel supplies,” with an eye toward the well accepted definition that supporting new fossil fuel supplies includes exploration for and / or development of oil, gas, and coal resources or reserves beyond those fields or mines already in production.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.