MCDONALD'S CORPORATION | Advisory Vote on Third-Party Civil Rights Audit at MCDONALD'S CORPORATION

55.77% votes in favour
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
that shareholders of McDonald’s urge the Board of Directors to oversee a third-party audit analyzing the adverse impact of McDonald’s policies and practices on the civil rights of company stakeholders, above and beyond legal and regulatory matters, and to provide recommendations for improving the company’s civil rights impact. Input from civil rights organizations, franchisees, corporate and franchise employees, suppliers, and customers should be considered in determining the specific matters to be analyzed. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential or proprietary information, should be publicly disclosed on McDonald’s website.
Supporting statement
Recently, the racial justice movement and the disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 have focused the public’s and policy makers’ attention on civil rights and gender and racial equity. McDonald’s says diversity, inclusion and equal empowerment are deeply rooted in its brand and underpin its success. Following the 2020 racial justice protests, it committed to “fair treatment in access, opportunity and advancement for all”, and stated an aim to “dismantle barriers to economic opportunity.”

Yet, it is unclear how McDonald’s addresses racial inequality, as it reports diversity data only for US company-owned restaurants and staff, excluding an estimated 660,000 US franchise workers.21 McDonald’s states that 72% of company-owned restaurant workers belong to historically underrepresented groups, but members of these groups hold only 29.1% of US leadership roles. McDonald’s does not disclose the extent or impact of any advancement training for its low wage restaurant crew workers. Inadequate wages, wage theft, lack of comprehensive sick leave, and health and safety risks have led to strikes and lawsuits by McDonald’s workers. More than 50 complaints and lawsuits alleging sexual harassment at company-owned and franchised McDonald’s outlets have been filed since 2016.

Lawsuits by 238 current and former Black franchisees describe “systematic and covert racial discrimination” and denial of “equal opportunity to success” from practices steering them to high cost, low volume operations in Black neighborhoods. Black McDonald’s executives have sued the company alleging disparate treatment based on race. The cases are pending.

A pending lawsuit alleges that while approximately 40% of customers are Black, McDonald’s tiered advertising budget based on racial stereotypes produces lower spend with Black-owned media groups. McDonald’s states that diverse-owned media represents 4%, and Black-owned media 2%, respectively, of advertising spend.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
LocalTapiola Asset Management Ltd For A vote FOR this resolution is warranted, as an independent civil rights audit would help shareholders better assess the effectiveness of McDonald’s efforts to address the issue of any inequality in its workforce and its management of related risks.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.