NIKE, INC. | China sourcing policy (Uyghur region human rights)

Status
6.35% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
NKE
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Modern slavery inc. forced labour
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
  • 2022 Nike Uyghur Region proposal Final.docx Download
  • Nike Uyghur Region Proposal Rationale 2022 FINAL.docx Download
Resolved clause
Resolved: Shareholders request that Nike adopt a policy to pause sourcing of cotton and other raw materials from China until the U.S. government Business Advisory is lifted or rescinded.
Whereas clause
It has been reported that as many as 1.8 million Uyghur people, a Muslim ethnic minority group in China, have been arbitrarily detained and forced to endure severe human rights abuses, including forced labor, torture, and political indoctrination in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Uyghur Region) since 2017 by the Government of the People’s Republic of China. Reports indicate they have been subjected to forced labor at virtually all workplaces, including in the cotton supply chain. The Uyghur Region produces approximately 85% of China’s cotton, and Nike’s manufacturing data suggests that about 30% of its materials were from Chinese factories.

Traditional supply chain risk mitigation measures, such as worker interviews and third-party audits, are unreliable or not effective in this unique, high-risk, conflict affected context. International labor auditors that conduct site visits and audits have been threatened, had their offices raided and closed, or been forced to leave the region.

Companies may face legal, regulatory, and business continuity risk associated with China and the Uyghur Region. Global leaders understand the urgency of this issue and are acting on it. For example, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), prohibiting importation to the United States of goods produced in the Uyghur Region, will enter into force in June 2022. The UFLPA covers goods produced with forced labor in China, not limited to the Uyghur Region, showing that this risk extends beyond the region. The U.S. State Department and other agencies issued the Xinjiang Supply Chain Business Advisory (“Business Advisory”) due to the severity and extent of forced labor and other human rights abuses, noting the risks to businesses that do not exit the region.

Nike’s long leadership in supply chain transparency is evidenced by its manufacturing map, robust policies, and industry collaboration. The company has acknowledged concerns regarding reports of forced labor in the Uyghur Region, stated it does not directly source from there and highlighted cotton traceability at the raw materials level as an area of focus. However, in this unique context, Nike’s efforts are inadequate. Its supply chain transparency covers primarily its “Tier 1” direct suppliers, and forced labor risks extend to raw material sourcing and manufacturing at further tiers. Sourcing and manufacturing cotton from China, not limited solely to the Uyghur Region, exposes Nike to legal and reputational risk. Nike has been named in a criminal complaint filed in the Netherlands in 2021 and various reports relating to the issue. Other companies have not only stopped sourcing from the Uyghur Region, but eliminated cotton from China throughout their supply chain to fulfill supply chain commitments prohibiting forced labor. Nike’s current actions leave shareholders concerned that cotton produced with forced labor may be in Nike’s products.

https://www.shu.ac.uk/helena-kennedy-centre-international-justice/research-and-projects/all-projects/laundered-cotton
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/cotton-12152020155916.html; https://manufacturingmap.nikeinc.com/
https://www.cecc.gov/sites/chinacommission.house.gov/files/documents/CECC%20Staff%20Report%20March%202020%20-%20Global%20Supply%20Chains%2C%20Forced%20Labor%2C%20and%20the%20Xinjiang%20Uyghur%20Autonomous%20Region.pdf
https://www.business-humanrights.org/fr/derni%C3%A8res-actualit%C3%A9s/china-closes-us-labour-auditor-as-tensions-mount-over-forced-labour-allegations/
https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Xinjiang-Business-Advisory-13July2021-1.pdf
https://purpose.nike.com/statement-on-xinjiang
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3158093/nike-patagonia-ca-named-dutch-criminal-filing-chinese-forced-labour; https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:e38ce54f-684d-4d55-8e62-ddc7ea20d9c9#pageNum=18; https://www.aspi.org.au/report/uyghurs-sale
https://enduyghurforcedlabour.org/fashion/; https://www.llbean.com/dept_resources/shared/L.L.Bean_Statement_on_Chinese_Cotton.pdf?nav=C3tbX-518056&qs=3080290_tv2R4u9rImY-IDPF4dKPdDwGVPlS_q_etw&cvosrc=Affiliate.linkshare.tv2R4u9rImY

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.