Three years ago, the incident of receiving cash and gifts came to light. The large amounts of cash and gifts were received from influential persons and related companies of local areas of nuclear power plant locations, and the trust in the Company crumbled. The Third Party Committee that investigated the incident made it clear that compensation was added to salaries for executives without approval, and the individual income tax for that additional portion was paid by the Company. Citizens were outraged that the executives of the Company, a public interest company, were secretly enriching themselves. Over 3,000 people accused nine former executives. The prosecution was dropped one time, but 1,338 people objected to the judgment and petitioned the Committee for the Inquest of Prosecution to pursue the case. Moreover, shareholders aim to unravel the incident of receiving cash and gifts in court, but the former executives, the defendants, have the audacity to say that they “only kept the money for the Company,” expressing no remorse for what they have done. Because the Company transitioned to a Company with Nominating Committee, etc. in order to increase the number of outside executives and prevent self-serving decisions on the amount of - 40 - remunerations, the Company should take the lead and disclose the remuneration of all Directors and Executive Officers individually.