iA Financial Group | Investment portfolio at iAFinancial Group

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Corporate purpose
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
It is hereby proposed that the company provide a breakdown of all of its investments, in the “Investments” section of its annual report, allowing for the measurement of the proportion of investments that respect the ESG criteria adopted by the company. 
Supporting statement
In December 2019, the company published its commitment to carbon neutrality.1 We applaud this commitment, but it should also extend to the company’s investment portfolio.
Indeed, in the current context of energy transition and commitments made by many financial actors, including countries, to reach ambitious quantified greenhouse gas
reduction targets (before 2030, or even 2025) with a view to achieving carbon neutrality in 2050, this would appear to be self-evident.
In its 2020 Sustainability Report,2 the company not only writes that it will “make public [its] Responsible Investment Policy” (p.12), but also states, relative to SASB Standard
FN-IN-410a, Incorporation of Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Investment Management (p.77), that “details on [its] portfolio are presented in the Investments section of [its] annual report.” However, the aforementioned section of the annual report3 (p.42) simply breaks down the investments by portfolio and provides little or no information on the ESG criteria used.
Of course, the sustainability report (p.51) mentions the ESG criteria used for the IA Clarington Inhance SRI funds and portfolios of the iA Clarington mutual fund subsidiary for which Vancity Investment acts as “sub-advisor.” Nonetheless, it is impossible to determine what proportion of the company’s other investments may meet these ESG criteria in the Investments section of the annual report, or in any other similar breakdown.
It would be relevant to break down the content of this section to allow for this, either on the basis of the ESG criteria already established, or on the basis of a recognized
standard for this purpose.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.