CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. | Non-interference policy (association/collective bargaining) at CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

33.25% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
Resolution details
Company ticker
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
The Board of Directors of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (“Chipotle”) shall adopt and disclose a Noninterference Policy (the “Policy”) upholding the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining in its operations as reflected in the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (“Fundamental Principles”). The Policy should contain commitments to the following:
• Non-interference when employees exercise their right to form or join trade union, which includes prohibiting Chipotle from undermining this right or pressuring employees seeking to form or join a trade union;
• Good faith and timely collective bargaining if employees form or join a trade union;
• Where national or local law is silent or differs from international human rights standards, Chipotle will follow the higher standards; and
• Processes to identify, prevent, account for and remedy any practices that violate or are inconsistent with the Policy.
Supporting statement
Freedom of association and collective bargaining are fundamental human rights under internationally recognized human rights frameworks, including the Fundamental Principles and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” According to the International Labour Organization, “Freedom of association refers to the right of workers …to create and join organizations of their choice freely and without fear of reprisal or interference”. As stated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, “…where national laws and regulations offer a level of human rights protection that falls short of internationally recognized human rights standards, enterprises should operate to the higher standard.”
Chipotle’s Code of Conduct is indeterminant as to which standards will prevail where applicable laws offer human rights protections that fall short of international human rights standards: “[w]e conduct our business in a way that respects fundamental human rights for all people and we support and align around the standards set out in U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other applicable federal, state, provincial and local laws.”
Chipotle has repeatedly interfered with workers’ exercise of fundamental rights in violation of international standards and/or applicable law. Alleged intimidation tactics include retaliatory firings and restaurant closures, anti-union consultants, and captive audience meetings. In October 2022, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) was investigating fourteen charges involving allegations of illegal attempts to thwart union activity.[3] The Board later determined that Chipotle violated federal The Board later determined that Chipotle violated federal labor law by closing a Maine restaurant where workers voted to unionize; it ordered Chipotle to reopen the restaurant and offer all dislocated employees jobs at the restaurant and back pay.
Microsoft recently adopted company-wide noninterference Principles[5] and announced a “labor neutrality agreement” at Activision Blizzard, which “reflects a fundamental belief … that enabling workers to freely and fairly make a choice about union representation will benefit Microsoft and its employees…

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
EFG Asset Management For A vote FOR this proposal is warranted, as this policy may benefit shareholders by improving the company’s
management of related risks and put the company more in line with peer disclosures.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.