BorgWarner Inc. | Report on climate-related just transition plan at BorgWarner Inc.

Status
32.02% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
BWA
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Just Transition
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
  • BorgWarner Domini proxy memo 2023 FINAL .pdf Download
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors publish a just transition report, disclosing how BorgWarner is assessing, consulting on, and addressing, the impact of its climate change-related strategy on relevant stakeholders, including but not limited to its employees, workers in its supply chain, and communities in which it operates, consistent with the ILO’s “just transition” guidelines. The report should be updated annually, at reasonable cost, and omit proprietary information.
Whereas clause
The Paris Agreement underscored the “close links between climate action, sustainable development, and a just transition.” To support implementation of a just transition, the International Labor Organization (ILO) developed guidelines discussing the anticipated employment impacts, importance of skills development and decent work during the energy transition, and adaptation needed by companies and communities to avoid lost assets, livelihoods or involuntary migration.1
Investors increasingly acknowledge the importance of a just transition and providing greater market certainty in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Over 700 investors, managing $68 trillion, support Climate Action 100+, which requests just transition disclosures.
The automotive industry is one of the heaviest contributors to global greenhouse gas emissions and must transition current business models from internal combustion engines to zero and lower-emissions technologies. Governments are calling for 40-50% of all vehicles sold to be electric vehicles by 2030.2
BorgWarner will play a meaningful role as a supplier to global auto manufacturers, many of which have electrification strategies. In its 10-K, BorgWarner says it is well positioned for the movement toward an electrified portfolio through investments and acquisitions, as well as dispossession of combustion assets. It plans to generate 45% of its revenue from products for electric vehicles by 2030, from less than 3% in 2021.3
Proponents believe this will cause disruption to current BorgWarner operations, which may result in significant changes to the number of workers, skills required, and manufacturing facility size and location, leading to impacts on local communities, including changes to economic activity or tax revenue for local governments.
While BorgWarner indicates it conducts training for salaried employees, its reporting lacks detail on the scale and reach of programs for the workforce affected by the electrification transition. It does not discuss the impact of its electrification strategy on communities and other stakeholders, or the locations where impacts are anticipated. It also does not report any strategies to support hourly employees, which comprise approximately two-thirds of its workforce.
Supporting statement
Shareholders recommend the report include, at Board discretion:
• A set of measurable, time-bound indicators, such as those recommended by Climate Action 100+, World Benchmarking Alliance, or the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero -- and progress against such indicators; and
• Disclosure on the company’s stakeholder engagement process in developing its just transition plan, such as participating stakeholders, key recommendations, and progress on recommendations made.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.