CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. | Adopt GHG reduction targets at CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.

Status
18.33% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
CNP
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Utilities
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
  • centerpoint energy exempt solicitation.pdf Download
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board disclose all Scope 3 emissions and set Paris-aligned, 1.5oC, Scope 3 targets across its full range of value chain emissions, including short, medium, and long-term targets.
Whereas clause
Energy utilities play a critical role in achieving the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.5oC). Electricity production accounts for 25% of national greenhouse gas emissions, and burning natural gas for heat in buildings accounts for approximately 11%.[1] Utilities also provide energy to some of the most greenhouse gas (GHG) intensive economic sectors. The International Energy Agency’s Net Zero Scenario is clear on the trajectory necessary to achieve 1.5oC, calling for net zero emissions from power generation by 2035 in advanced economies and globally by 2040, while requiring a 40% reduction of emissions from the building sector by 2030.
Fossil fuels, including natural gas, have significant upstream emissions associated with their production.[2],[3] Many utilities’ net zero climate targets fail to account for the significant and material value chain emissions associated with upstream production of gas, downstream burning of gas by customers, and purchased power from the grid. The Climate Action 100+ initiative, a coalition with $68 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Benchmark (“Benchmark”) outlining metrics that create climate accountability for companies and transparency for shareholders.[4] Indicators 1 through 5 of the Benchmark seek reporting on companies’ Net Zero emissions ambitions; short, medium, and long-term GHG reductions goals; and action plans to achieve decarbonization targets. The Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) similarly requires that material Scope 3 emissions be included in company GHG reduction targets.[5]
CenterPoint discloses operational emissions and emissions from use of sold products.[6] It fails, however, to disclose upstream product emissions, which are likely significant, adding between 16 to 65 percent to natural gas combustion emissions.[7] With regard to target setting, CenterPoint has committed to achieve net zero emissions by 2035 for its operational emissions, and to reduce emissions from use of sold products by 20 to 30%.[8] These targets fail to address the remaining 70 to 80 percent of use of sold products and all other Scope 3 value chain emissions, including upstream natural gas emissions. In contrast, peer utilities are starting to account for value chain emissions. PSEG and NRG committed to set a net zero target through the Science Based Targets initiative. Sempra, Duke, and Dominion set net zero targets covering full Scope 3 value chain emissions, while Xcel and CMS have expanded their net zero targets to include customer use of natural gas.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest, at management’s discretion, the report:
• In setting targets, take into consideration approaches used by advisory groups such as the Science Based Targets Initiative;
• Provide a timeline for setting a 1.5oC aligned Net Zero by 2050 GHG reduction target, and 1.5 degree-aligned interim goals;
• Provide an enterprise-wide climate transition plan to achieve net zero emissions.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.