CITIGROUP INC. | Limit high carbon financing at CITIGROUP INC.

Status
10.13% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
9
Resolution details
Company ticker
C
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Fossil fuel financing
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt a policy for a time bound phase out of Citi’s lending and underwriting to projects and companies engaging in new fossil fuel exploration and development.
Whereas clause
Climate change poses a systemic risk, with estimated global GDP loss of 11-14 percent by midcentury under current trajectories.1 The climate crisis is primarily caused by fossil fuel production and combustion, enabled by funding from financial institutions. New oil and gas fields would not produce in time to mitigate current energy market turmoil resulting from the Ukraine War.
Citi group (Citi) committed to align financing with the Paris Agreement goals,5 achieving net zero by 2050, consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.6 However, Citi’s current policies and practices are not net zero aligned.
Citi is the world’s second largest fossil fuel funder, providing $285 billion in lending and underwriting to fossil fuel companies during 2016-2021, including $104 billion to 100 top companies engaged in new fossil fuel exploration and development.7 Citi’s existing commitments do not equate to alignment: under its 2030 absolute emissions target for energy, Citi can continue to finance new fossil fuel exploration and development, locking in future emissions and increasing stranded asset risk.
Without a policy to phase out financing of new fossil fuel exploration and development, Citi is unlikely to meet its climate commitments and merits scrutiny for material risks that may include:
• Greenwashing: Banking and securities regulators are tightening and enforcing greenwashing regulations, which could result in major fines and settlements.8
• Regulation: Central banks, including the Fed, are starting to implement climate stress tests9 and scenario analyses,10 and some have proposed increased capital requirements for banks’ climate risks.11
• Competition: Dozens of global banks have adopted policies phasing out financing of new oil and gas fields12 and coal mines.13
• Reputation: Campaigns targeting Citi’s climate policies include hundreds of organizations with tens of millions of global supporters, including current and potential Citi’s customers.14
By exacerbating climate change, Citi is increasing systemic risk, resulting in significant negative impacts – including physical and transition risks.15
Best practices for banks to achieve net zero involve financing of companies reducing scopes 1-3 absolute emissions and allocating capital in line with science based, independently verified short, medium and long term decarbonization targets. Organizations like the Science Based Targets initiative and Transition Pathway Initiative can provide independent verification of decarbonization targets.
Supporting statement
This proposal is intended, in the discretion of board and management, to enable support for Citi’s energy clients’ low carbon transition.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Rothschild & co Asset ManagementFor
Anima SgrAgainstThe company has made commitments and established policies working toward a low-carbon economy and has an environmental and social risk framework and mechanisms for managing environmental, social, and financial risks. While one of the company's peers has committed to no longer finance new oil and gas development, and investors may wish to engage with the company on the pace of its efforts, Citigroup seems to generally be in line with other big banks that are disclosing financed emissions and setting emissions reduction targets. The company appears to be taking sufficient action to transition toward a low-carbon economy and to report on its efforts.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.