COMCAST CORPORATION | Set GHG emissions reduction targets at COMCAST CORPORATION

Status
9.78% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
9
Resolution details
Company ticker
CMCSA
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request Comcast issue near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of maintaining global temperature rise to 1.5°C and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 in order to limit global warming to 1.5°C and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5°C will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike.
In its 10-K, Comcast Corporation (“Comcast” or “the Company”) acknowledges that “natural disasters, severe weather and other uncontrollable events could adversely affect our business, reputation and results of operations.” Such events are expected to become more frequent and more severe as climate change worsens. The Company’s current climate strategy fails to address its full carbon footprint, notably its full Scope 3 footprint, which is its largest emissions source. Comcast’s targets have also not been third-party verified for 1.5°C alignment. While its subsidiary Sky has set a near-term 1.5°C-aligned target and committed to net zero through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), Sky produces a minority of Comcast’s total Scope 1 and 2 emissions[1] and likely a minority of its Scope 3 footprint, but this information is not disclosed.
Competitors across Comcast’s business segments, including AT&T, Netflix, Paramount, Sony, T-Mobile, and Verizon, have set, or committed to set, science-based GHG reduction targets through SBTi. SBTi-validated targets give investors confidence that companies are addressing their material carbon footprint in line with limiting warming to 1.5°C. Furthermore, competitors like T-Mobile, Verizon, and Walt Disney have quantitative, timebound targets for renewable energy. Investors increasingly seek disclosure of how companies are addressing climate risk and planning to transition their business models in line with limiting warming to 1.5°C. To assist companies in developing viable transition plans, groups including We Mean Business, State Street Global Advisors, and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures have provided guidance.
Comcast must take additional action to comprehensively address its climate impact and mitigate both the physical risks to its operations and the transition risks associated with new regulation and a global shift to a clean energy economy. Investors believe adopting 1.5°C-aligned science-based targets for its full material carbon footprint will help the Company mitigate these risks.
Supporting statement
In assessing targets, we recommend:

-Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;
-Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups; and
-Consideration of supporting targets for renewable energy, zero-emission vehicles, and other measures deemed appropriate by management.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Anima Sgr For There is significant shareholder interest in companies taking a proactive approach to addressing climate change.
The company taking a proactive step in its climate change disclosure and goals will allow it to lead its peers and be
prepared for any potential disclosure requirements. Shareholders would benefit from additional information on
how the company plans to align its operations with the Paris Agreement goals and manage its GHG emissions and
climate-related risks.
Rothschild & co Asset Management For
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. Against We believe the Company has shown adequate responsiveness to climate-related issues via its existing targets and commitments and do not believe that the proponent has successfully argued that, in light of this responsiveness, adoption of this proposal would serve to enhance or protect shareholder value

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.