The Kraft Heinz Company | Report on water risks at The Kraft Heinz Company
How other organisations have declared their voting intentions
Organisation name | Declared voting intentions | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Anima Sgr | For | A vote FOR this resolution is warranted. Shareholders would benefit from the requested report as it would provide additional information on the company's water supply and conservation practices, particularly in its supply chains, thereby accounting for water risk throughout the entire value chain. Furthermore, the disclosure would allow the company to better manage water related risks and align company commitment to long term shareholder value. |
PGGM Investments | For | Kraft Heinz's current water stewardship approach focuses on its direct operations, whereas this proposal requests a water risk assessment that covers the entire supply chain. According to the scientific literature, for companies in the food sector, the vast majority of their water footprint comes from agricultural supply chains. Kraft Heinz therefore conducts a water risk assessment that covers only a small fraction of the company's water footprint. Without a supply chain risk assessment, investors have little assurance that the company's supply chain interventions to manage water risks are being deployed in areas facing the most severe risks. |
DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.
Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.
Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.