MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION | Report on methane measurement at MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
MPC
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Methane
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Marathon issue a report analyzing the reliability of its methane emission disclosures. The report should:
• Be made public, omit proprietary information, and be prepared expeditiously at reasonable cost;
• Summarize the outcome of efforts to directly measure methane emissions, using recognized frameworks such as OGMP;
• Describe any material difference between the Company’s direct measurement results and Company’s reported methane emissions; and
• Based on the results, assess whether to alter the Company’s actions to achieve its climate targets.
Whereas clause
Methane is at least 80 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports that 32% of methane emissions from human activities comes from natural gas and petroleum systems.1 According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), cutting methane is the strongest lever to slow climate change over the next 25 years. The EPA methodology used to calculate methane emissions underestimates leakage rates and fails to capture many major leaks, which contribute to climate change and waste valuable product. Studies have found actual emissions to be 50 to 100% higher than reported emissions.3 In certain basins, emissions are more than 10 times industry-disclosed figures.2 Therefore, oil and gas industry scope 1 emissions may be significantly higher than currently reported. Methane emissions estimates improve when direct measurement methodologies are used and when emissions are identified by source type and at a site or facility level as shown by the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP)4 , a multi-stakeholder initiative launched by UNEP committed to improving methane data quality and consistency.
The United States joined the Global Methane Pledge in 2021, committing to use best available inventory methodologies to quantify methane emissions. The same year, investors managing more than $6 trillion supported strong federal methane regulations. Companies responsible for approximately 30% of global natural gas production, including bp, Cheniere, ConocoPhillips and Occidental have joined the OGMP. 5 Companies that do not adequately manage methane emissions risk their reputation and license to operate.

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (“Marathon” or “Company”), through its limited partnership MPLX, operates large natural gas gathering and processing networks. MPLX has set targets to reduce its methane emissions, including by employing advanced monitoring technologies, and by quantifying, monitoring, reporting and verifying greenhouse gas emissions at facilities that are part of Cheniere’s supply chain.6 However, Marathon has not taken the critical steps to reduce investor concerns by using direct methane measurement across all operations and reporting on it.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.