Olympic Steel Inc. | Climate transition plan / GHG reduction goals at Olympic Steel Inc.

AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the Board issue a report, excluding confidential information, disclosing how Olympic Steel intends to reduce its operational and value chain GHG emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal requiring Net Zero by 2050 emissions.
Whereas clause
In addition to environmental and social harms, climate change is creating systemic risk to the economy, making the corporate sector’s contribution to climate mitigation a significant policy issue. The latest IPCC publication states that the window for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.5°C), and thereby avoiding the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, is quickly narrowing and that immediate, sharp emissions reductions are required of all market sectors and industries.
In response, shareholders are addressing the growing material climate risk to their companies and their portfolios. For instance, the Climate Action 100+ initiative, a coalition of more than 700 investors with over $68 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Benchmark (“Benchmark”) outlining metrics that create climate accountability for companies and transparency for shareholders. Indicators 1 through 5 of the Benchmark seek reporting on companies’ net zero emissions ambition; short, medium, and long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions goals; and strategic actions planned to achieve decarbonization targets.
Steel is one of the most emissions-intensive industries due to its heavy use of fossil fuels, contributing over 6% of global emissions. Olympic Steel is a processor and distributor of industrial metals. Our Company has not disclosed GHG emissions from either its operations or its value-chain and has not set short or long-term 1.5oC-aligned GHG reduction targets.
To manage climate risk, it is critical that companies set GHG emissions reduction targets to their guide planning and investment decisions. Steel markets are already shifting to lower GHG emissions. General Motors,[4] Ford,[5] and Volvo are moving to procure low-carbon steel.[6] The Science Based Targets initiative lists 26 companies in the ‘Mining -- Other Metals’ industrial sector as committed to or having approved net zero targets, including peers SSAB and thyssenkrupp. Tata Steel, Arcelor Mittal, US Steel, and Nucor have made commitments to produce net zero steel by 2050 or earlier. By setting 1.5°C, Paris-aligned GHG reduction targets for its Scope 1 through 3 emissions, disclosing a net zero transition plan, and demonstrating progress toward achieving these goals, Olympic Steel can provide investors with assurance that management is reducing its climate contribution, addressing the risks and opportunities associated with climate change, and remaining competitive.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest, at Company discretion, that the Company:
• Disclose a timeline for setting a net zero by 2050 GHG reduction target and 1.5°C aligned interim goals;
• Consider approaches used by advisory groups such as the Science Based Targets initiative;
• Include an enterprise-wide climate transition plan to achieve 1.5oC aligned emission reductions;
• Annually report progress towards meeting its emissions reduction goals.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.