Royal Bank of Canada | Absolute Greenhouse Reduction Goals at Royal Bank of Canada

Status
17.17% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
RY:CN
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Fossil fuel financing
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
Shareholders request Royal Bank of Canada (“Company”) issue a report within a year, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, that discloses 2030 absolute greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets covering its lending and underwriting activities for two high emitting sectors: Oil and Gas and Power Generation. These targets should be aligned with a science-based net zero pathway and in addition to any emission intensity targets for these sectors that the Company has or will set. 
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5°C.1 Every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5°C will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks to companies, investors, the markets, and the economy as a whole. According to the International Energy Agency, transformation of the Oil and Gas and Power Generation sectors are critical to keeping temperature rise below 1.5°C and therefore significant to RBC's climate-risk mitigation strategy. The Company defines the Oil and Gas sector to include upstream, downstream, and integrated sub-sectors, and Power Generation to include electricity generation.
Though the Company has a commitment to reach net zero emissions by 2050 and a target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity of the Oil and Gas and Power Generation sectors by 2030, it does not yet have a science-based 2030 target to reduce these emissions on an absolute basis. Intensity targets will measure the reduction in emissions per unit or per dollar, however, they will not capture whether the Company's total financed emissions have decreased in the real world.
We believe the Company should adopt absolute emissions targets in these sectors and consider target-setting approaches used by advisory groups such as the Science Based Targets initiative. Such absolute reduction targets aligned with a science-based net zero emissions pathway are important for the Company to achieve its net-zero commitment, more fully address its climate risks and protect long-term investors.
The Company has acknowledged that [a]chieving net-zero emissions in [its] lending will require absolute [greenhouse gas] emissions reductions across a number of key sectors that are both high-emitting and critical to the Canadian economy.2 Nonetheless it trails peers in setting absolute emissions reduction targets. Citigroup has committed to reducing its absolute emissions for the energy sector by 29% by 2030 and Wells Fargo has set a target to reduce absolute emissions for the oil and gas sector by 26% by 2030. Other banks setting absolute reduction goals for the oil and gas sector include HSBC (34%), Société Generale (30%), BBVA (30%), and Deutsche Bank (23%). The Company should ensure that it is moving toward its stated commitments, real-economy emissions reductions, and long-term value creation.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Anima Sgr For A vote FOR this proposal is warranted, as adoption of interim absolute GHG emissions reduction goals and reporting on
plans to achieve such goals would better inform shareholders to the specific policies, practices, or systems the company
may implement to manage its GHG emissions. Creating and reporting absolute goals would also allow shareholders to
better evaluate the company's related emissions performance and the effectiveness of any mitigation measures the
company may implement to manage these activities.
VidaCaixa For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.