Global Payments Inc. | Plans for racial equity & DEI disclosure at Global Payments Inc.

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
GPN
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Global Payments Inc. publish a report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, disclosing the racial equity actions and targets the Company has put in place, if any, and providing data reflecting the success of such actions in promoting and improving racial equity outcomes.
Whereas clause
Following George Floyd’s murder by police officers on May 25, 2020, a majority of Russell 1000 corporations made public statements expressing their plans to address racial justice, thereby taking an important step in acknowledging diversity, equity and inclusion, and racial equity, as core to their business. Global Payments Inc. (“Global Payments”) did not release a racial justice statement and has limited public disclosure related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
A McKinsey study[1] cites material corporate benefits associated with policies promoting racial justice:
• Companies with the strongest racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to outperform their industry medians for earnings before interest and tax;
• Companies with the most ethnically/ culturally diverse boards are 43% more likely to earn higher profits;
• For every 10% increase in racial and ethnic diversity among senior executives, EBIT rises 0.8.
• Yet, inequities in the workplace continue:
• People of Color comprise 33% of entry-level positions but 13% of the C-suite;[2]
• In 2019, among the Russell 3000, Black individuals accounted for 4.1% of Board members versus 13.4% of the U.S. population.[3]
Global Payments is falling behind its peers in its reported diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. Global Payments earned a low score of 14% on a recent Racial Justice Scorecard.[4] Global Payment’s score ranks below that of peer companies Block and Fiserv, which scored 17% and 25% respectively. Global Payment’s low score is due, in part, to a lack of publicly accessible diversity, equity, and inclusion targets and disclosed data concerning recruitment, retention, and promotion rates of people of color within the Company.
Given heightened awareness around racism, failing to act on racial justice or to disclose related policies and quantifiable data raises the material risk of reduced brand value. Global Payments can reduce this risk and play an important role in furthering racial equity by promoting diversity, equity and inclusion within the Company.
Supporting statement
This resolution was filed by PCR Children's Tr FBO Ellen (S).
Investors seek quantitative, comparable data to understand if and how the Company is promoting a commitment to racial equity. Proponents suggest the report include:
• Quantitative diversity, equity, and inclusion information, including EEO-1 data and recruitment, retention, and promotion rates for people of color within the Company;
• Any plans to improve disclosures on the performance indicators that underlie the Company’s low scores compared to its peers on the above-referenced Racial Justice scorecard;
• Policies the Company could adopt to promote racial equity in its corporate workplaces and operations.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.