Post Holdings Inc | Disclosure of Pesticide Use in Agricultural Supply Chains at Post Holdings Inc

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
POST
Lead filer
As You Sow
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Public health
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Post issue a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, explaining if and how the company is measuring the use in its agricultural supply chains of pesticides that cause harm to human health and the environment.
Whereas clause
Pesticides threaten farmer resiliency and productivity due to proliferation of pesticide-resistant weeds and insects, loss of topsoil, and soil degradation. Pesticides also threaten biodiversity, harming soil invertebrates, birds, and mammals. Soil consistently treated with pesticides loses its ability to store water and carbon, threatening resilience to climate change.
One third of every bite of food we eat is dependent on pollinators; and pollinator species are declining at alarming rates in significant part due to the use of toxic pesticides on farms. [1], [2] Pesticides also cause a number of serious human health effects, from cancers to neurological damage.

In a 2021 investor scorecard on management of pesticide risks in agricultural supply chains, Post Holdings ranked last, scoring zero points. Our company has not disclosed if or how it tracks, reports, or reduces the use of synthetic pesticides in its agricultural supply chains, representing an important blind spot in risk management.

Other major food companies are taking action to reduce and report on pesticide risk:
- General Mills discloses metrics for tracking and reporting pesticide use by suppliers in its regenerative agriculture program, including type and name of input, amount and method used, cost and date of application, and pest or disease being controlled. It also reports pounds of pesticides avoided.
- Lamb Weston discloses average pesticide use data across its potato supply chains (reported in pounds of active ingredient use per ton of potatoes grown.)
- Sysco reports annually on pesticide use avoided by suppliers using Integrated Pest Management (IPM) -- reporting 8.4 million pounds avoided in 2019.
- PepsiCo announced a 2030 goal to scale regenerative farming practices across 7 million acres, equivalent to its entire agricultural footprint.
- Kellogg’s incorporated pest management and pesticide use into its 2020 ingredient materiality assessment.
- In a competitive marketplace that is increasingly demanding clean food and reduced stakeholder and environmental harm, understanding and tracking supplier use of pesticides reduces risk for shareholders and our company, while reducing harm to stakeholders.
Supporting statement
While metrics are left to management discretion, shareholders recommend the company measure and disclose the following:
- Type and amount of pesticides avoided annually through strategies such as regenerative agriculture programs, integrated pest management, or other methods;
- Priority pesticides for reduction or elimination;
-Targets and timelines, if any, for pesticide reduction.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.