The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | Report on GHG emissions targets at The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
BK
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Fossil fuel financing
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that BNY Mellon, within a year set near and long term GHG emission reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement's 1.5-degree goal requiring net zero emissions by 2050. The targets should address, among other sources, the emissions associated with the Company's lending and investment activities, as well as underwriting when methodologies become available, for its highest-emitting sectors.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be cut in half by 2030 and achieve net zero by 2050 in order to meet the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. At current emissions trajectories, an estimated 10% of global economic value could be lost by 2050.
Banks play a critical role in limiting global temperature rise, and they may face serious business risks associated with financing projects or companies that lack alignment with the Paris Agreement’s goals. Financing high-emitting activities poses systemic risks to the global economy, portfolio-wide risks to diversified investors, and serious risks to banks' own operations.

Bank of New York Mellon (BNY)’s financing includes servicing clients in the fossil fuel sector, most notably serving as administrative agent for a multi-year revolving credit facility for Southwest Gas.2 While BNY has set Scope 1 and 2 reduction targets in line with Science Based Targets initiative methodology, the Company does not yet measure or disclose the carbon footprint associated with its lending or investment activities, nor has it adopted targets to reduce these emissions. Research shows that, on average, financed emissions are 700 times greater than a financial institution’s direct emissions,3 indicating that BNY is currently addressing only a small fraction of its total climate impact.

In contrast to BNY’s lagging climate action, competitors have taken steps to mitigate their risk. Asset managers including BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, have set interim GHG targets for their investments through the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. Major banks like Wells Fargo and Citibank have set targets to reduce their financed emissions associated with high-emitting sectors like energy and power generation.

Investors applaud the progress made by two BNY subsidiaries, Insight and Newton, who have set interim targets through the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative but remain concerned that BNY has not yet made similar enterprise-wide commitments.
Supporting statement
In assessing targets, proponents recommend, deferring to the Board’s and management’s discretion:
• Disclosure of the Company's Scope 3 emissions, starting with those associated with the Company’s investment activities for high-emitting sectors;
• A commitment to reach net zero by 2050 or sooner;
• A near-term (2030 or sooner) target for its highest emitting sectors, with plans to update the target every 5 years from 2030 onwards; and
• Consideration of approaches used by advisory groups such as the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials and the Science Based Targets initiative.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.