Activision Blizzard | Respect for Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining at Activision Blizzard

Status
35.40% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
ATVI
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders urge the Board of Directors of Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”) to adopt and publicly disclose a policy on its commitment to respect the international human rights of freedom of association and collective bargaining. The policy should:
- Be applicable to Activision’s direct operations and subsidiaries globally;
- Include a commitment to non-interference when employees exercise their right to form or join trade unions;
- Prohibit any member of management or agent of Activision from undermining the right to form or join trade unions or pressuring any employee from exercising this right;
- Describe the ongoing due diligence process Activision will use to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for any violations of these rights, including how it will remedy any misaligned practices.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Freedom of association and collective bargaining are internationally recognized human rights according to the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work1 and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.2 The United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights urge companies to “know and show” that they respect human rights by adopting “a human rights due diligence process to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address their impacts on human rights.”3
According to Activision’s 2021 annual report, none of its U.S. employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and that while “[w]e deeply respect the rights of all employees to make their own decisions about whether or not to join a union,” Activision also prefers “a direct relationship between managers and team members.”4 In contrast to Activision’s preference for maintaining a direct (i.e., union free) relationship with its employees, Microsoft announced that it would remain neutral if its employees express interest in joining a union.5
In October 2022, Region 18 of National Labor Relations Board found merit in allegations that Activision had withheld raises from workers because of their union activity after quality assurance testers working for Activision subsidiary Raven Software voted to unionize.6 In May 2022, Region 31 of the National Labor Relations Board found merit in allegations that Activision illegally threatened workers and enforced a social media policy that conflicts with workers’ rights.7 Activision has denied these allegations and they have not been adjudicated.
We believe this proposal will also help address human rights risks at Activision’s operations in other countries where freedom of association and collective bargaining may not be adequately protected by local law. We note that as of December 31, 2021, Activision had approximately 25 percent of its employees in the Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and approximately 7 percent in the Asia Pacific region.8
For these reasons, we urge shareholders to vote FOR this resolution.
1 https://www.ilo.org/declaration/lang‐‐en/index.htm2 https://www.un.org/en/about‐us/universal‐declaration‐of‐human‐rights3 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf 4 https://investor.activision.com/static‐files/d7b4f08d‐213b‐4bd5‐a41b‐7497baa9c1065 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/business/microsoft‐activision‐game‐union.html6 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/technology/activision‐nlrb‐ruling.html7 https://fortune.com/2022/05/23/activision‐blizzard‐illegally‐threatened‐staff‐us‐labor‐officials‐find/8 https://investor.activision.com/static‐files/d7b4f08d‐213b‐4bd5‐a41b‐7497baa9c106

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.