AMAZON.COM, INC. | Gender and Racial Pay Gap at AMAZON.COM, INC.

Status
29.24% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
13
Resolution details
Company ticker
AMZN
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved:  Shareholders request Amazon report on median pay gaps across race and gender, including associated policy, reputational, competitive, and operational risks, and risks related to recruiting and retaining diverse talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, litigation strategy and legal compliance information.
Racial/gender pay gaps are defined as the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings (Wikipedia/OECD, respectively).
Whereas clause
Whereas:  Amazon is under public scrutiny for alleged unfair pay and working conditions. On Black Friday, workers went on a mass strike demanding fair wages. The campaign Make Amazon Pay states, “Amazon squeezes workers,” alleging real wages decreased while Amazon achieved record revenue in the second quarter of 2022.[1]
Pay inequities pose substantial risks to companies and society, as they persist across race and gender. Black workers’ hourly median earnings represent 64 percent of white wages. The median income for women working full time is 83 percent that of men. Intersecting race, Black women earn 63 percent, Native women 60 percent, and Latina women 55 percent.  At the current rate, women will not reach pay equity until 2059, Black women in 2130, and Latina women in 2224. Citigroup estimates closing minority and gender wage gaps 20 years ago could have generated 12 trillion dollars in additional national income.[2]
Actively managing pay equity is associated with improved representation. Diversity in leadership is linked to superior stock performance and return on equity.[3] Minorities represent 70 percent of Amazon’s workforce and 34 percent of leadership. Women represent 45 percent of the workforce and 23 percent of leadership.[4]

Best practice pay equity reporting consists of two parts: Unadjusted median pay gaps, assessing equal opportunity to high paying roles,statistically adjusted gaps, assessing whether minorities and non-minorities, men and women, are paid the same for similar roles.  
Amazon reports statistically adjusted gaps but ignores unadjusted gaps, which address structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay, particularly when men hold most higher paying jobs. While Amazon reports diversity data, median pay gaps show, quite literally, how Amazon assigns value to employees through the roles they inhabit and pay they receive. Median gap reporting also provides a digestible and comparable data point to determine progress over time. Racial and gender median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way of measuring pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and International Labor Organization. The United Kingdom and Ireland mandate disclosure of median gender pay gaps.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement: An annual report adequate for investors to assess performance could, with board discretion, integrate base, bonus and equity compensation to calculate:
percentage median gender pay gap, globally and/or by country, where appropriatepercentage median racial/minority/ethnicity pay gap, US and/or by country, where appropriate[1] https://makeamazonpay.com/map/
[2]https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/636c01a29dd3d63e30153443/1668022691457/Racial+and+Gender+Pay+Scorecard+2022.pdf
[3] Ibid.
[4] https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/2021-sustainability-report.pdf
 

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
EFG Asset Management For A vote FOR this proposal is warranted, as shareholders would benefit from additional information allowing them
to better measure the progress of the company's diversity and inclusion initiatives and its management of related
risks.
Anima Sgr For As Amazon does not publish for its U.S. or global workforce the same gender pay gap statistic as it publishes in the UK. The median pay gap statistic provides benefits such as transparency and comparability across time and organizations and serves as one measure of representation of women in senior positions. For its U.S. workforce, Amazon uses an "equal pay for equal work" statistic in which the company defines what it considers to be an "equal job." The company's disclosure of a pay equity statistic and its diversity and inclusion efforts provide shareholders with some visibility into how well the company is addressing the underrepresentation of women and underrepresented minorities at senior levels. However, Amazon has recently faced lawsuits and fines concerning its hiring and pay practices. Publishing the unadjusted pay gap statistic could increase accountability for diversity efforts and would provide shareholders with useful information about how effectively management is assessing and mitigating risks that may arise from inequitable worker treatment.
VidaCaixa For
Rothschild & co Asset Management For
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. Against

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.