AMAZON.COM, INC. | Tax Transparency Report at AMAZON.COM, INC.
How other organisations have declared their voting intentions
| Organisation name | Declared voting intentions | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Dana Investment Advisors (Delisted) | For | |
| EFG Asset Management | For | A vote FOR this proposal is warranted as the proposed GRI Tax Standard would enhance the company's transparency in communicating its tax practices to investors globally. |
| Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. | For | |
| Anima Sgr | For | As Amazon provides information on its tax contributions in its Annual Report for U.S. federal, state, and international income taxes. It states that it expects it will be required to report country-by-country tax information for European Union countries and certain other countries following the European Parliament’s recent vote to require certain companies to publicly disclose such information. Hence, Amazon's public tax disclosure through GRI reporting standard would address and sustain investor demands for tax transparency at the global level. |
| VidaCaixa | For | |
| Rothschild & co Asset Management | For | |
| CANDRIAM | For | At Candriam, we believe that the demand formulated by this resolution is fully aligned with our Proxy Voting Policy as it pushes for more transparency by asking for a country-by-country tax report, which enables us to ensure our investee companies pay their fair amount of tax and assess whether they are involved in aggressive tax planning. Although Amazon.com argues that much of the asked information is already published, we believe that such a report is a negligible increased burden for the company and would only support the company’s argument that it is both collaborating with various tax authorities and a significant tax contributor in the jurisdictions it operates. Especially, providing figures on its contributions on a country basis would comfort the company’s statement as well as enable shareholders to assess the risks and opportunities arising from the company’s tax practices. Candriam considers that the country-by-country reporting of information does not lead to the disclosure of sufficiently sensitive or confidential information as to confer a competitive disadvantage as also specified by the 2018 Review of the EU Commission. We believe that reporting on tax practices and providing stakeholders with more granularity on the different company’s paid taxes should not be seen as a competitive disadvantage. In contrast, we see among the company’s peers that some whose reporting is in line with GRI Tax Standard benefited from such disclosure. Finally, since coming legislation will require Amazon.com to align with such reporting practices, taking the lead on this would help the company to gain more understanding from investors on its tax practices and on the challenges it faces. As such, we vote FOR this shareholder proposal. |
DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.
Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.
Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.