THE BOEING COMPANY | Gender and Racial Pay Gap at THE BOEING COMPANY

Status
47.40% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
9
Resolution details
Company ticker
BA
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: James McRitchie of CorpGov.net and other shareholders, request The Boeing Company (Boeing) report annually on unadjusted median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender globally and/or by country, where appropriate, including associated policy, reputational, competitive, operational risks, and risks related to recruiting and retaining diverse talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, litigation strategy, and legal compliance information. Racial/gender pay gaps are defined as the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings.
Supporting statement
Pay inequities persist across race and gender. They pose substantial societal and company risks. Black workers’ hourly median earnings represent 64% of white wages. Median income for full-time working women working 83% that of men. Intersecting race, Black women earn 63%, Native women 60%, and Latina women 55%. At the current rate, women will not reach pay equity until 2059, Black women 2130, Latina women 2224.
Citigroup estimated closing minority and gender wage gaps 20 years ago could have generated $12 trillion in additional national income. PwC estimates the gender pay gap costs OECD economies $2 trillion annually. Minorities represent 32.7% of Boeing’s United States workforce and 22.7% of VP leadership. Women represent 24.6% of the workforce and 25.6% of executive leadership. Actively managing pay equity is associated with improved representation. Diversity is linked to superior stock performance and return on equity.
Best practice includes:1. unadjusted median pay gaps, assessing equal opportunity to high-paying roles,2. statistically adjusted gaps, assessing whether minorities and non-minorities, men and women, are paid the same for similar roles.

Boeing does not report quantitative unadjusted or adjusted pay gaps. Over 20% of the 100 largest U.S. employers report adjusted gaps. An increasing number of companies disclose unadjusted gaps to address the structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay. Boeing reports neither.
Racial and gender unadjusted median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way of measuring pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, OECD, and International Labor Organization. The United Kingdom and Ireland mandate disclosure of median pay gaps, and the United Kingdom is considering racial pay reporting. While Boeing reports diversity data, unadjusted median and adjusted pay gaps would show how Boeing assigns value to its employees. Pay gap reporting provides digestible, comparable data to determine progress over time.

An annual report adequate for investors to assess performance could integrate base, bonus, and equity compensation to calculate:
• percentage median and adjusted gender pay gap, globally and/or by country
• percentage median and adjusted racial/minority/ethnicity pay gap, U.S. and/or by country
Supporting data: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/Racial+Gender+Pay+Scorecard+2022+-+Arjuna+Capital.pdf

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.