BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION | Racial equity audit at BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

Status
15.24% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
11
Resolution details
Company ticker
BAC
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED that shareholders of Bank of America Corporation (“BofA”) urge the Board of Directors to oversee a third-party racial equity audit analyzing BofA’s adverse impacts on nonwhite stakeholders and communities of color. Input from civil rights organizations, employees, and customers should be considered in determining the specific matters to be analyzed. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential or proprietary information, should be publicly disclosed on the bank’s website.  
Supporting statement
Recently, the racial justice movement together with the disproportionate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on communities of color have focused the public’s and policy makers’ attention on racial equity issues.  Following the June 2020 protests related to George Floyd’s murder, BofA announced it would commit $1 billion to racial equity initiatives with an additional $250 million in March 2021 because of the urgent need “to address long-standing issues of inclusion and racial inequality…”
BofA has a conflicted history when it comes to racial equity issues.  In 2018, the Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency found that the bank offered disproportionately fewer home loans to minorities than to white applicants in Philadelphia.  The bank also closed 29.1% of branches in majority-Black communities compared to 18.4% in non-majority Black areas from 2010-2018, despite the important role that branches play in supporting small businesses.  From an employment perspective, while the bank recently increased representation of minorities in its senior executive team, executive/senior level officials and managers comprise only 5% of Black employees and 4% of Hispanic employees according to its last EEO-1 report although 45% of its workforce are people of color.  
While BofA has provided specific areas it plans to focus on, including funding affordable housing through minority depository institutions, its racial equity commitment does not address concerns related to its own financial products. Further, the bank provided $15 billion in affordable home lending outside of its racial equity commitment, but this earmarked amount is a fraction of the bank’s own residential mortgage lending portfolio, valued at approximately $215 billion in 2020.  The bank has yet to provide information about how it plans to evaluate the racial impact of its direct lending as part of its strategy to address racial inequality.
Lastly, the bank’s corporate contributions are not fully aligned with its public statements: it donates to 11 police foundations that critics note bypass normal procurement processes to buy equipment for police departments, including surveillance technology that has been used to target communities of color.[1]
[1] Little Sis.  “Police Foundations: A Corporate Sponsored Threat to Democracy and Black Lives.” p. 28 and 51. Oct. 5, 2021, available at https://policefoundations.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Police-Report-2021_10_05_FINALV3.pdf.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Anima Sgr For A third-party audit assessing the racial equity impacts of the company's policies and practices could help shareholders assess the effectiveness of BofA's efforts to address the issue of racial inequality and its management of related risks. Additionally, the audit would strengthen the company's commitment to its diversity, equity, and inclusion goals.
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. For
Rothschild & co Asset Management For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.