MAXIMUS, Inc. | Equal Employment Opportunity Report at MAXIMUS, Inc.

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
MMS
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt a policy requiring Maximus to disclose on its website the annual Consolidated EEO-1 Report. The company shall disclose its EEO-1 Report no later than 60 days after the date of its submission to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Shareholders also request disclosure of all of Maximus’ diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, on its website or another public filing or report.
Whereas clause
SUPPORTING STATEMENT:Recently, the racial justice movement and the disproportionate impacts of the pandemic have focused investor attention on civil rights and gender and racial equity in the workplace. Further, workforce diversity is increasingly seen as a driver of long-term value creation. Accordingly, investors benefit from better understanding of DEI strategy and performance at portfolio companies.
Maximus touts its commitment to DEI, stating that it is “central to our company identity” and a “business imperative.” Maximus says that DEI “broadly outlines the comprehensive efforts we are taking to create a more inclusive workplace.”1 While we appreciate these assurances, investors are unable to evaluate Maximus’ performance in this area without additional workforce diversity disclosure.
Maximus is required to annually submit an EEO-1 Report — a comprehensive breakdown of its workforce by race and gender according to 10 employment categories — to the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The disclosure of this report would provide comprehensive and standardized workforce diversity data to investors with minimal additional burden on Maximus.
Such disclosure is increasingly becoming standard practice. According to an analysis by As You Sow, 90% of the S&P 100 have released or committed to release their EEO-1 reports and that 67% of the Russell 1000 firms disclose workforce diversity data in some form.2 Widespread disclosure of EEO-1 data is critical because the standardization provides consistency, allowing investors to compare progress across firms.
Research shows that more diverse workforces are linked to improved financial performance. According to a Wall Street Journal analysis of workforce diversity in S&P 500 companies, the 20 companies that ranked the highest outperformed the bottom 20 by an average operating margin of 12% compared to 8% over the same period. The top companies’ stocks also performed better with an average stock return of 10% versus 4.2% over the same 5 year period.3
Studies also show that diversity at multiple echelons of a company can have a big impact, highlighting investors’ need for the comprehensive, workplace, demographic disclosure requested in this proposal. A McKinsey study found that companies in the top quartile for ethnic and gender diversity in its executive ranks were 29% more likely to perform better than their peers in the quartile.4 A 2021 study found that high levels of racial diversity in both upper and lower management was associated with increased productivity.5
1 https://maximus.com/DEI
2 https://www.asyousow.org/our-work/social-justice/workplace-equity
3 https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-business-case-for-more-diversity-11572091200
4 https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity
5 https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amj.2019.0468

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.