Suncor Energy Inc. | Report on capital expenditure alignment with GHG reduction targets at Suncor Energy Inc.

Status
17.70% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
1
Resolution details
Company ticker
SU:CN
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Suncor produce a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, outlining how its capital expenditure plans align with its 2030 emissions reductions target and its 2050 net zero pledge.
Supporting statement
Suncor has a 2030 emissions reduction target of 10 Mt CO2e and a 2050 net zero target.
Suncor indicates it is committing 10% of its annual capital budget over the medium term to “investments that advance our low-carbon energy offerings.”1 Suncor does not provide a rationale for this level of investment and how it aligns with its targets nor disclose specific planned investments and associated emissions reductions.
Similarly, Suncor does not disclose emissions expectations associated with the other 90% of its planned capital budget and whether these investments take the company further from its climate targets. Note that there is no baseline established for Suncor’s 2030 target, nor are Scope 3 emissions included in it, meaning that the vast majority of Suncor’s capital expenditures may contribute towards emissions expansion.

The International Energy Agency projects a three-quarters decline in oil demand in its net zero scenario2 and Canada’s Energy Regulator predicts oil production in Canada will peak shortly after 20303. These reductions are part of the net zero transition that is an existential threat to unprepared oil companies and is particularly acute for Suncor and other oil sands producers producing a higher cost4 and higher emitting5 source of oil than most competitors.
Considering this threat, it is critical that investors are given more clarity on how Suncor’s capital expenditure plans align with its 2030 emissions reductions target and its 2050 net zero pledge Suncor’s climate plans rely heavily on carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) for meeting its climate goals. Yet the company does not disclose spending plans for CCUS, including overall cost and projections of cost-per-barrel over the medium and long term.
Climate Action 100+, a global investor initiative representing US$68 trillion in assets under management, found in its October 2022 Assessment that Suncor “does not meet any criteria” for capital alignment, medium term targets or decarbonization strategy.”6

To address investor uncertainty and to manage business risk, we urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
British Columbia Investment Management Corporation For We are supporting this shareholder proposal calling for additional disclosure related to the company's capital allocation plans and their alignment with the company’s emissions reductions targets. Additional disclosure helps investors better assess how environmental risks can affect a company's activities and longer-term financial results. This resolution is aligned with the expectations and goals of the Climate Action 100+ engagement.
CoreCommodity Management, LLC For
DESJARDINS GLOBAL ASSETS MANAGEMENT For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.