Paycom Software Inc. | Transition to elect directors by majority vote

Status
56.73% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
PAYC
Lead filer
CorpGov.net
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: Shareholders of Paycom Software Inc (‘Paycom’) request the Board of Directors amend our policies, articles of incorporation, and/or bylaws to provide that director nominees be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast, with a plurality vote standard retained for contested director elections, that is, when the number of director nominees exceeds the number of board seats. This proposal includes that a director who receives less than a majority vote be removed as soon as a replacement director can be qualified on an expedited basis. If such a removed director has key experience, they can transition to a consultant or director emeritus. With written justification, the board can set an effective date several years into the future for these changes to take effect.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement: To provide shareholders a meaningful role in director elections, Paycom’s current director election standard should transition from a plurality vote standard to a majority vote standard when only board-nominated candidates are on the ballot.

Under Paycom’s current voting system, a director can be elected if all shareholders oppose the director but one shareholder votes FOR, even by mistake. 91.6% of companies in the S&P 500 have adopted majority voting for uncontested elections.

In 2022 majority shares voted FOR similar proposals at 2U Inc. (97.9% for), Warrior Met Coal (66.5%), nCino (98.8%), and IQVIA Holdings (58.6%).

Vanguard, one of our largest shareholders, wrote: “If the company has plurality voting, a fund will typically vote for shareholder proposals requiring majority vote for election of directors.” BlackRock wrote: “Majority voting standards assist in ensuring that directors who are not broadly supported by shareholders are not elected to serve as their representatives.” Many of our other large shareholders have similar proxy voting policies.

Unlike 89.4% of S&P 500 companies, Paycom has a staggered board. Also, unlike most S&P 500 companies, Paycom does not provide shareholders the right to call special meetings or act by written consent. Paycom also requires a supermajority vote for shareholders to vote to amend bylaws.

Our outdated governance structure reduces accountability. We should not risk Zombies on Board: Investors Face the Walking Dead (https://www.msci.com/www/blog-posts/zombies-on-board-investors- face/02161045315).

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.