NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION | Climate Transition Plan and GHG Reduction Goals at NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NSC
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request Norfolk Southern Corporation, within a year, issue near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with maintaining global temperature rise to 1.5°C and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5°C. 
Every incremental increase in temperature above the Paris Agreement’s goal of holding warming to 1.5°C will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike.
In its 2022 10-K, Norfolk Southern Corporation (“Norfolk”, or “the Company”) highlighted its climate risk, noting, “Severe weather and disasters have caused, and could again cause, significant business interruptions and expenditures.” The Company also noted, “Restrictions, caps, taxes, or other controls on GHG emissions, including diesel exhaust, could significantly increase our operating costs and decrease the amount of traffic we handle.”
Despite acknowledging its climate risk, Norfolk’s mitigation strategy falls short of what is needed to shield the Company and investors from climate-related risks. The Company’s short-term commitment through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is not aligned with limiting warming to 1.5°C. SBTi will soon require targets not yet aligned with 1.5°C be updated to reach alignment in order to be validated.  Norfolk also does not have a long-term GHG reduction target aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement.
Norfolk trails its competitors in setting holistic GHG reduction targets and managing climate risks. Union Pacific has committed to setting near and long-term science-based targets (SBTs) through SBTi. The Canadian National Railway Company has also committed to set a long-term SBT through SBTi.
There is growing interest from investors in increased disclosure of how companies are addressing the climate crisis and planning to transition their business models to ones that align with limiting warming to 1.5°C. To assist companies in developing viable transition plans, groups including We Mean Business, CDP, State Street Global Advisors, and the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures have provided guidance.
Ramping up its climate-related initiatives may unlock opportunities for Norfolk’s growth by preparing the Company for future climate-related regulations that would affect its operations. The Company can also become a more compelling sustainable solution for customers and potential customers decarbonizing their supply chains.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In assessing targets, we recommend, at board and management discretion:
Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups; and,Consideration of supporting targets for energy efficiency, zero-emission material sourcing, and other measures deemed appropriate by management.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.