NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION | Paid Sick Leave Policy at NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NSC
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders of the Norfolk Southern Railroad ask the Board of Directors to adopt and publicly disclose a policy that all employees, part-time and full-time, accrue a reasonable amount of employer-provided paid sick leave as determined by the Board of Directors. This policy should not expire after a set time or depend upon the existence of a global pandemic.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: One out of five people working in the United States have no access to earned sick time, or "paid sick leave", for short-term illness, health needs and preventive care.[1] They face an impossible choice when they are sick: stay home and risk their economic security or go to work and risk their coworkers' health and the public's health.
As the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, paid sick leave is a crucial contributor to public health by allowing sick workers who are contagious to isolate themselves from their coworkers and the public. One study found a 56% reduction in COVID-19 cases as the result of temporary federally mandated COVID-19 paid sick leave in states that did not previously have paid sick leave laws.[2] State and local paid sick leave laws have also been shown to reduce influenza-like illness infections without causing negative effects on employment or wages.[3]
Under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, railroad employees are only entitled to sickness benefits after seven days of illness.[4] Railroad employees and their unions have expressed concern that these benefits are inadequate, and that employees risk discipline if they need to take unscheduled time off due to sickness.[5] Workers' concerns about the need for paid sick leave have been exacerbated by the railroad industry's adoption of "precision scheduled railroading" that has reduced railroad carrier staffing levels by 30 percent over the past six years.[6] In 2022, members of various railway unions rejected tentative agreements that did not contain employer provided paid sick leave benefits.[7]According to the Association of American Railroads, a nationwide rail shutdown due to a labor dispute could cost the U.S. economy more than $2 billion a day.[8]
We believe adopting a comprehensive, permanent, and public paid sick leave policy would help make the future operating environment more equitable and mitigate reputational, financial, and regulatory risk to the Norfolk Southern Railroad.

[1] https://www.bIs.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2021/employee-benefits-in-the-united-states-march-2021.pdf
[2] https://vvww.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00863
[3] https://voxeu.org/article/pros-and-cons-sick-pay.
[4] https://rrb.gov/Benefits/UB9
[5] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/28/business/railroad-workers-strike-threat.html
[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/business/economy/railroad-workers-strike.html
[7] https://www.npr.org/2022/11/17/1136459343/railroads-rail-workers-strike-negotiations-labor-union
[8] https://www.aar.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/AAR-Rail-Shutdown-Report-September-2022.pdf

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.