Nutrien | Company Policy Compared to External Indigenous-led Standards of Practice at Nutrien

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Local communities and/or indigenous rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
Resolved that: The board of directors report to shareholders on the extent to which our company’s policies, plans, and practices regarding Indigenous reconciliation (including Indigenous community relations, the recruitment and advancement of Indigenous employees, internal Indigenous cultural awareness education, and procurement from Indigenous-owned businesses) compare to, or are certified by external Indigenous-led standards of practice.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
To be responsive to the regulatory and reputational pressure related to Indigenous reconciliation, many companies have developed internal policies, plans, and programs on Indigenous relations, the recruitment and advancement of Indigenous employees, Indigenous cultural awareness training for employees, and procurement from Indigenous-owned businesses.
For investors, however, the breadth, depth, and content of these policies, plans, and programs is impossible to determine. Facing inconsistent disclosure, the extent to which a company has effectively incorporated and implemented steps to address Indigenous reconciliation and inclusion is impossible to measure.
There are, however, externally-verified options for corporations to demonstrate that their programs meet standards developed by qualified Indigenous organizations, such as the Progressive Aboriginal Relations (PAR) program of the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business, which provides independent certification to corporations in Canada. Within Canada’s financial sector, this is already an established best practice: BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC, Deloitte, EY, ATB Financial, and Accenture have all achieved certification under the PAR program, and others have committed to achieving certification.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.