Quanta Services | GHG Goals at Quanta Services

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
PWR
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request Quanta adopt independently verified near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of maintaining global temperature rise to 1.5° and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
Whereas: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Exceeding 1.5 ° presents risks to the global economy and investors with global GDP loss estimated to be 11-14% by midcentury under current trajectories.[1] A warming climate is associated with supply chain disruptions, reduced resource availability, lost production, political instability, reduced worker efficiency, and adverse health impacts that disproportionally affect low-income communities and communities of color.

Quanta Services Incorporated (Quanta) disclosed its Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the first time in its 2022 Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) report, following D- grades from CDP in 2020 and 2021. However, the company did not include a full accounting of its Scope 3 emissions in its disclosure. And although it has set a target to reduce fleet idling time, it does not have a target which covers its Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions.[2]

Quanta faces a variety of risks and opportunities stemming from the climate crisis, and the company has named the potential brand risk that could be posed by environmental mismanagement.[3] However, while its peers are addressing climate-related risks by setting emissions goals, Quanta appears to be falling behind. Over 4,000 companies have set or committed to set third-party verified GHG goals aligned with climate science via the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), including many peers identified in Quanta’s 2022 Proxy Statement’s Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Aecom, Corning, Dover, Emcor, KBR, Parker-Hannifin, and Jacobs Engineering.[4]

Given the impact of climate change on the economy, the environment, and human systems, proponents believe Quanta’s board and management have a responsibility to investors and stakeholders to adopt GHG goals aligned with a 1.5° scenario and to outline a clear plan that demonstrates accountability. Independently verified, science-based goals covering Scopes 1-3 would provide shareholders with objective assurance that Quanta is doing its part to adequately manage its climate risk.

Resolved: Shareholders request Quanta adopt independently verified near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of maintaining global temperature rise to 1.5° and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement: In assessing targets, we recommend:

Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;
Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups; and
Consideration of supporting targets for energy efficiency, low-carbon materials and other measures deemed appropriate by management.
[1] https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/topics-and-risk-dialogues/climate-and-natural-catastrophe-risk/expertise-publication-economics-of-climate-change.html

[2] Quanta Services 2020, 2021, 2022 CDP reports

[3] Quanta Services 2022 CDP report

[4] https://sciencebasedtargets.org/companies-taking-action

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.