Activision Blizzard | Director elections at Activision Blizzard

Status
Voted
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
1
Resolution details
Company ticker
ATVI
Submitted by
-
Resolution ask
Strengthen board oversight of issue
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Director vote
Filer type
Management
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Whereas clause
The directors up for election at the company's 2023 AGM are as following:

1) Brian Kelly
- Chairman of board of directors


2) Reveta Bowers
-Compensation Committee
-Workplace Responsibility Committee

3) Kerry Carr
- Audit Committee

4) Robert Corti
- Audit Committee
- Nominating and Corporate Goverance Committee

5) Robert Kotick

6) Barry Meyer
- Nominating and Corporate Goverance Committee

7) Robert Morgado
- Compensation Committee (Chair)
- Nominating and Corporate Goverance Committee (Chair)

8) Peter Nolan
- Audit Committee

9) Dawn Ostroff
- Compensation Committee
- Worplace Responsibility Committee (Chair)
Supporting statement
Last year, shareholders voted 67.35% in favour of a proposal titled 'Effectiveness and outcomes of company efforts to prevent abuse, harassment and discrimination'. PRI research finds that as of 01 March 2023 there is no evidence that the company has been responsive to shareholder views on this matter.

The 2022 proxy season had one of the highest records for majority-supported environmental, social, and governance (ESG) shareholder proposals in recent years, according to PWC. But as the 2023 proxy season commences, companies are acting on – and implementing – less than two out of every five of those shareholder proposals, according to their proponents. In approximately a quarter of cases, the investor proponent believes the proposal will not be addressed at all.

Access the research here: www.unpri.org/active-ownership-20/are-corporate-boards-responding-to-successful-shareholder-esg-proposals/11160.article

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.