DOLLAR TREE, INC. | Income inequality and impact on diversified shareholders at DOLLAR TREE, INC.

Status
6.88% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
DLTR
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED, shareholders ask that the board commission and publish a report on (1) whether Dollar Tree participates in compensation and workforce practices that prioritize Company financial performance over the economic and social costs and risks created by income inequality and racial and gender disparities and (2) the manner in which any such costs and risks threaten returns of diversified shareholders who rely on a stable and productive economy.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Dollar Tree Inc. employs more than 210,500 associates[1] and reports median pay as $13,490, which is below the 2022 $13,590 Federal Poverty level for a single person.[2] While the Company’s workforce is 67.8% female and 55.2% minority, these groups make up only 24.8% and 18.4% of officer and director level management positions.[3]

Many retailers have raised their minimum wage well above legal minimums, but Dollar Tree has not.[4], [5]

In a recent JUST Capital poll, 87% of Americans say large U.S. companies have a responsibility to regularly increase wages to keep up with the rapidly rising cost of living.[6]

Increasing wages for those earning the least is fundamental to ensuring an equitable economy that leaves no one behind while promoting shared prosperity, and helps to close gender and racial pay gaps.[7]

More than half the U.S. population is not earning a living wage.[8] According to MIT, the national average living wage is $17.46 per hour – or $36,311 annually.[9] The current federal minimum wage is just $7.25 and applies in 20 states.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that income inequality has risen between 1979 and 2019, even after accounting for transfers and taxes.[10]

Income inequality harms the entire economy:

Income inequality slows U.S. economic growth by reducing demand by 2 to 4 percent.[11]
A 1% increase in inequality leads to a 1.1% per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) loss.[12]
Gender and racial pay gaps created $2.6 trillion in U.S. GDP losses in 2019.[13]
Eliminating racial pay disparity would add $5 trillion to the U.S. economy over the next five years.[14]
GDP drag reduces returns on diversified portfolios[15] and creates social costs that threaten financial markets. For example, inequality increases health costs and decreases the value of human capital.[16] By paying less than a living wage, Dollar Tree increases its margins and improves financial performance. But gains in Company profit that come at the expense of society and the economy is a bad trade for most Company shareholders, who are diversified and rely on broad economic growth to achieve their financial objectives. The costs and risks created by inequality will reduce long-term diversified portfolio returns.

Dollar Tree lists increasing minimum wage laws as a risk to its business strategy[17] but fails to disclose the cost its compensation practices impose on the broader economy and diversified portfolios.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. Against

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.