SHELL PLC | Approve Shell's energy transition progress at ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC

Status
80.01% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
25
Resolution details
Company ticker
RDSB
Submitted by
Resolution ask
Strengthen board oversight of issue
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Other management proposal or proxy item
Filer type
Management
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United Kingdom
Resolved clause
Resolution 25 asks shareholders to approve Shell's Energy Transition Progress for the year 2022, as disclosed in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report AND the Shell Energy Transition Progress
Report 2022, which are published on the Shell website
Supporting statement
In 2021, shareholders overwhelmingly supported Shell’s energy transition strategy, reflected through an advisory vote at the Annual General Meeting. In 2022, 80% of Shell’s shareholders voted in support of the progress it had made in 2021 in implementing its energy transition strategy. Shell continues to implement that strategy, and this year is asking shareholders to vote on its progress in 2022. Shell’s Directors believe that the Company has made good progress. In 2024, Shell’s updated energy transition strategy will be put to shareholders for an advisory vote, and the Company will be engaging with investors ahead of its publication. Shell’s energy transition strategy centres on its target to become a net-zero emissions energy business by 2050. The Company has set climate targets that it believes are aligned with the more ambitious goal of the UN Paris Agreement on climate change: to limit the increase in the average global temperature this century to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels (see page 12 of Shell’s Energy Transition Progress Report 2022). Shell’s short-, medium-, and long-term targets cover greenhouse gas emissions from its own operations and customers’ emissions from the use of its energy products (Scope 1, 2, and 3).

In 2021, Shell set an ambitious new target to reduce absolute emissions from its operations (Scope 1 and 2) by 50% by 2030, compared with 2016 levels on a net basis. By the end of 2022, Shell had made good progress with a 30% reduction on a net basis. Global energy-related carbon emissions increased by around 4% in the same period. [A] As an energy provider, Shell has set a target to reduce the net carbon intensity of the energy products it sells by 20% by 2030. It has achieved its 2022 short-term target of a 3-4% reduction in net carbon intensity with a reduction of 3.8% since 2016. Our analysis, using data from the International Energy Agency, shows the net carbon intensity of the global energy system fell by around 2% over that time. [B] Shell has taken significant investment decisions in the production of low-carbon fuels, solar and wind power and renewable hydrogen.
In 2022, this included the $1.6 billion investment in Indian renewable power developer Sprng Energy. Shell also announced the acquisition of Denmark’s Nature Energy, which produces renewable natural gas from agricultural, industrial and household waste, for around $2 billion. This deal completed in February 2023. In parallel, Shell continued to make significant changes to its Upstream and Refinery portfolios. Shell believes that for the world to decarbonise, a dramatic change in demand for energy is just as critical as changes to supply. That is why an essential part of Shell’s strategy is working with its customers across different sectors to help reduce their emissions. Last year, Shell continued to work with some of the world’s biggest companies in sectors including aviation, road transport and technology. Shell was the first major energy company to measure progress in transforming its businesses for a lower-carbon future within long-term pay frameworks. Shell’s Remuneration Committee determined in the first quarter of 2023 that the element of the 2020 Long-term Incentive Plan weighted to the energy transition should vest at 180%. Another resolution, proposed by Follow This, is considered to be against shareholders’ financial interests and would not help to mitigate global warming. It is therefore also not in line with the Company’s strategy, which is intended to promote the success of the Company and accelerate the energy transition.
Conclusion: The Company has set ambitious targets that it believes are in line with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. Shell’s strategy supports a balanced transition, one that maintains the supply of oil and gas where it is still needed, while moving to net-zero emissions.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
MNAgainstAlthough we recognize the progress made by Shell on the Energy Transition Plan, we cannot support the approval of the progress. In 2021, when Shell put the Energy Transition plan up to a vote to the AGM, we voted against the approval of the plan because it was not sufficiently aligned with the Paris agreement. Since then, no major adjustments were made to align the targets with a 1.5C degrees pathway. Therefore, we cannot support progress on a plan which is not Paris aligned.
Anima SgrAgainstThe Company's Scope 3 targets relate to intensity reduction, rather than absolute emission reduction. Additionally, there is a lack of detail on the Company's Scope 3 emissions and on how it intends to meet its associated targets. More granular and explicit disclosure should be provided to enable stakeholders to make the connection between the Company's goals and the relevant IEA net zero pathways. Furthermore, CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) and offsets form a sizable part of the plan.
While it is acknowledged that the Company has provided more information on why it considers its targets aligned with the more ambitious of the Paris scenarios, Client Earth has initiated legal proceedings in the UK, alleging that Shell's directors have failed in their duty to manage and foresee risk related to climate change.
PGGM InvestmentsAgainstWe voted against Shell's Energy Transition Plan in 2021 because we are not convinced it is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement. The company has not materiality improved its plan since then and we cannot support the progress on a plan that is not Paris aligned.

EFG Asset ManagementAgainstA vote AGAINST the transition progress report is warranted. The Company's Scope 3 targets relate to intensity
reduction, rather than absolute emission reduction. Additionally, there is a lack of detail on the Company's
Scope 3 emissions and on how it intends to meet its associated targets. More granular and explicit disclosure
should be provided to enable stakeholders to make the connection between the Company's goals and the
relevant IEA net zero pathways. Furthermore, CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) and offsets form a sizable part
of the plan.
Rathbones Group PlcAgainst
Rothschild & co Asset ManagementAgainst

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.