Tenet Healthcare Corporation | Patient's right to access abortion in emergency at Tenet Healthcare Corporation

Status
8.78% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Public health
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED:
Shareholders request that the Company report on its current policy regarding availability of abortions in its operations, including but not limited to whether such policy includes an exception for the life and health of the pregnant person, and how the Company defines an emergency medical condition.
Supporting statement
WHEREAS:

Tenet Health operates hospitals and other acute health care facilities in 19 states that have adopted laws severely restricting access to abortion. According to its website, Tenet Health’s impact “spreads far and deep with more than 465 ambulatory surgery centers and surgical hospitals, 61 hospitals and approximately 110 additional outpatient centers and other sites of care.”1

Although most abortions are not performed in a hospital setting, those that are performed in a hospital are often the most serious and complicated abortions, including those performed because a woman’s life or health is in danger or in later stages of pregnancy, when severe fetal anomalies are first detected.

As many as 30% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, and the methods of managing a miscarriage are the same as for abortion. Some untreated miscarriages can lead to complications that can be life-threatening. Ectopic pregnancies (1-2% of all pregnancies) are never viable. (Washington Post, 7.16.22)

It has been widely reported that in states that have passed severe restrictions on abortion, doctors have been struggling with the legality of providing terminations for ectopic pregnancies, incomplete miscarriages, or other circumstances where miscarriage is inevitable or the health or life of the pregnant woman is in danger. Some patients have been denied care by health care providers. (Associated Press, 6.16.22; Bloomberg, 7.12.22; Washington Post, 7.16.22; Texas Tribune, 7.15.22; Kaiser Health News, 8.8.22)

The Department of Health and Human Services, under guidance from the executive order of President Biden, clarified that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) preempts any state law which prohibits abortion and does not include an exception for the life and health of the pregnant person. Therefore, healthcare providers are required to provide stabilizing medical treatment, including abortion, to a patient who presents to the emergency department and is found to have an emergency medical condition.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.