Leidos holdings, inc. | Report on Political Expenditures Congruence at Leidos holdings, inc.

Status
40.56% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
LDOS
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Corporate purpose
  • Lobbying / political engagement
  • Public health
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Leidos publish a report, at reasonable expense, analyzing the congruence of the Company’s political and electioneering expenditures during the preceding year against publicly stated company values and policies, listing and explaining any instances of incongruent expenditures, and stating whether the Company has made, or plans to make, changes in contributions or communications to recipients as a result of identified incongruencies.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Leidos Holdings, Inc. sponsors a federal political action committee (PAC) whose decisions are based on Leidos’ publicly expressed goals and the best interests of the company, the employees, and the shareholders.
Leidos states: Everything we do is built on a commitment to do the right thing for our customers, our people, and our community. Leidos makes the world safer, healthier, and more efficient through technology, engineering, and science. We strengthen our communities through volunteerism, sustainable operations, and the advancement of equality. The Leidos core values are integrity, inclusion, innovation, agility, collaboration, and commitment.
However, Leidos’ politically focused expenditures appear to be misaligned with its public statements on Company values, vision, and operational practices. As examples, Leidos states:
▶We are committed to a culture that provides equitable access to opportunities and resources for everyone, yet Proponent estimates that in the 2021-2022 election cycles, Leidos and its employee PAC made political donations totaling at least $460,500 to politicians and political organizations working to weaken women’s access to reproductive health care.
▶We seek to advance environmental sustainability by doing our part to preserve natural resources, reduce emissions and limit waste, yet Leidos is a member of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce which has consistently lobbied to roll back climate regulations and slow the transition toward a low carbon energy mix.
▶We are building a workplace that cultivates opportunity, advances equality, and is free from discrimination, inequity and maltreatment, yet Leidos is receiving negative media attention for PAC contributions to candidates who are making discriminatory statements against a protected class. Integrity is a core value, yet the Leidos PAC has contributed $144,000, to 33 candidates who voted against certifying the 2020 election and continue to promote the “big lie” that the election was stolen.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Proponents recommend, at Board and management discretion, that the report also include management’s analysis of risks to the Company brand, reputation, or shareholder value associated with expenditures in conflict with its publicly stated company values. Expenditures for electioneering communications means spending, from corporate treasury and from the PACs, directly or through a third party, at any time during the year, on printed, internet, or broadcast communications, which are reasonably susceptible to interpretation as being in support of or opposition to a specific candidate.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.