RTX Corporation | Adopt GHG targets and issue transition plan (1.5C aligned)

Status
Deleted
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
RTX
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board issue a report, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, disclosing how RTX intends to reduce its full value chain emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports that immediate and significant emissions reductions are required of all market sectors to stave off the worst consequences of climate change.[1] Decarbonizing the aviation industry is a critical component of global decarbonization, according to the International Energy Agency.[2] Investor demand for science-aligned emission reductions and transition planning reflects the reality that climate-related risk exposure is growing.[3]

RTX Corporation, a major U.S. defense contractor and industrial corporation, is subject to substantial emerging regulations in both the U.S. and abroad regarding its emission-intensive operations and products.[4] For example, the proposed Federal Supplier Climate Risks and Resilience Rule would require large federal contractors to disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions and set science-based emissions reduction targets.[5] By reducing emissions from its full value chain in alignment with global goals, RTX can meet new regulatory requirements, increase competitiveness in low-carbon technology development, address new capital deployment needs, and take advantage of low-carbon financial opportunities.

RTX’s current disclosures lack specific, forward-looking, and quantitative action plans that are sufficient to achieve alignment with the global aim of 1.5°C. While RTX has set a science-aligned emissions reduction target for its operations, this goal covers less than 10% of the Company’s total emissions.[6] RTX has yet to set a target to reduce emissions from its value chain, which constitutes 90% of the Company’s overall emissions. This failure to address emissions across its full value chain, coupled with the absence of a comprehensive transition plan, leaves the Company’s exposed to growing climate-related risks.

Aerospace and industrial companies are galvanizing action and investment toward decarbonization. RTX risks falling behind as peers Airbus, BAE Systems, Cisco Systems, Deere & Company, Honeywell, and Safran have established emission reduction targets through the Science Based Targets initiative that cover all scopes of emissions.[7]

By setting science-aligned emission reduction targets across its full value chain and providing a comprehensive transition plan, RTX Corporation can improve its competitiveness against peers, prepare for regulation, and position itself to maximize climate-related opportunities.
Supporting statement
Proponents recommend, at Board discretion, that reporting include:

A timeline for setting 1.5°C-aligned, near-term emission reduction targets;
A timeline for setting long-term net zero goals;
A climate transition plan to achieve emissions reduction goals across all relevant emission scopes; and
Annual reporting demonstrating progress towards meeting emission reduction goals.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.