ROSS STORES, INC. | Climate transition plan and GHG reduction goals at ROSS STORES, INC.

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
ROST
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Ross Stores measure and publicly disclose all material value chain GHG emissions.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports that immediate and significant emissions reductions are required of all market sectors to stave off the worst consequences of climate change.[1] Investor demand for transparent emissions disclosures reflects the reality that climate-related risk exposure is growing alongside proposed and implemented regulations.[2]

Fashion contributes 10% of the worldÕs annual carbon emissions according to 2019 data published by the United Nations Environment Programme and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.[3] For many clothing companies, the most significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and thus climate risk, is contained within their value chain. In fact, value chain emissions frequently constitute as much as 90% of retailersÕ overall climate footprint,[4] making the quantification and mitigation of value chain emissions an essential step in reducing climate risk and meeting shareholder expectations for climate action.[5]

Retail clothing enterprises like Ross are subject to increasing climate-related risks due to climate-related production and supply chain costs and the potential for shortages of raw materials like water and cotton.[6] Ross also faces risk as consumers become increasingly climate conscious; over 70% of consumers take the environment into account when shopping,[7] and consumers expect Brands to meaningfully address climate change.[8] Ross also faces growing regulatory risk due to its emissions-intensive value chain.

Although Ross StoreÕs has a Ònet zero-ambitionÓ and discloses its operational Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions, the Company does not disclose all material Scope 3 value chain emissions categories.[9] This critical reporting gap leaves both Ross and investors without essential information regarding RossÕ climate related supply chain, regulatory, and reputational risk.

Other retailers are leading the way by implementing transparent and complete GHG emissions disclosures. Peers such as Target and Walmart disclose all material value chain emissions categories and have even set science-based emissions reductions targets for their value-chain emissions.[10]

By disclosing all material value chain emissions, Ross Stores can improve its competitiveness against peers, prepare for climate regulation, reduce unforeseen risks from its supply chain, and position itself to maximize benefits from climate-related opportunities.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Proponents recommend, at the boardÕs discretion, that the Company report all relevant value chain emissions through a recognized framework, such as CDP, and include material value chain emissions disclosures in Ross StoresÕ annual Corporate Social Responsibility Report.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Degroof Petercam Asset Management (DPAM) For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.