STARBUCKS CORPORATION | Board voting in response to human capital mismanagement at STARBUCKS CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
SBUX
Resolution ask
Strengthen board oversight of issue
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Director vote
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: We believe Starbucks’ human capital mismanagement is materially damaging the way customers and employees perceive the Company by exposing the business to reputational risk and potential financial harm over the long-term.
In fact, the Company recently experienced significant stock price declines following weakening sales, with the ongoing labor issues, related litigation and staff walkouts also cited by outside observers as negative factors for the share price.2
Notably, at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a majority of shareholders who voted at the meeting voted in favor of commissioning an independent assessment of its worker rights practices – reflecting what we see as the deep unease investors feel around the Company’s handling of these issues. When the report was released, the auditor concluded that the Company did not understand or give consideration to its labor rights commitments in the context of recent organizing.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: the SOC has nominated a slate of three highly qualified director candidates who can bring fresh perspectives and the right expertise to help improve oversight and safeguard the best interests of Starbucks’ shareholders, customers and employees.
Nominees:
Maria Echaveste
Hon. Joshua Gotbaum
Hom. Wilman Liebman

https://www.brewabetterstarbucks.com/our-nominees

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.