Nordea Bank AB | Stop financing fossil companies that expand extraction and lack robust fossil phase-out plans in line with 1.5 degrees

Status
3.73% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
24
Resolution details
Company ticker
NDA SEK
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Fossil fuel financing
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
Sweden
Resolved clause
Resolved: the General Meeting resolves to add the following wording to the Articles of Association:"
The company’s strategy shall fully align with the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5
degrees. The company will therefore not provide lending and underwriting to companies and projects
that expand fossil fuel extraction and/or lack Paris-aligned phase-out plans" (proposal in Annex 1).
Supporting statement
Supporting statement
The Paris Agreement states that all financial flows must be directed away from activities that
exacerbate the climate crisis and instead be directed towards activities that offer solutions to it. It has
never been clearer that climate action must be radically accelerated; the world is headed for a
warming of more than 2.9 degrees with devastating consequences. The banks play an important role
in breaking this trend and speeding up the transition.
The report Banking on Thin Ice (2022) from ActionAid Denmark, BankTrack, Fair Finance Guide,
Friends of the Earth Finland (Hiilivapaa Suomi), Greenpeace and the Swedish Society for Nature
Conservation (Naturskyddsföreningen) shows that Nordea has continued to support fossil fuel
companies with new loans totalling USD 3.2 billion over the past two years (July 2020 – June 2022).
The majority of the loans have gone to companies that are expanding their extraction, including in
sensitive areas such as the Arctic. This despite the fact that the International Energy Agency (IEA) has
concluded that the expansion of the extraction of fossil fuels must stop immediately, if we are to limit
global warming in accordance with the Paris Agreement's 1.5-degree target.
A new report The real carbon footprint of Swedish banks (2024) from Fair Finance Guide and Swedish
Society for Nature Conservation shows that the emissions from Nordea’s lending to the oil and gas
sector accounts for three per cent of its total financed emissions, despite that the lending to this
sector accounts for only 0.21 per cent of the total lending. It clearly illustrates that acting to reduce
the financed emissions from the oil and gas sector is both necessary and an effective way to reduce
the bank’s overall climate footprint, and thereby contributing to its overall commitment to align with
the 1.5-degree target.
Nordea’s current fossil fuel sector policy does not live up to best practice. Two of its main
competitors, Handelsbanken and Danske Bank, have in the last year imposed restrictions that to a
large extent are in line with this shareholder resolution. Handelsbanken published its new climate
policy in June last year and already see a positive impact on their business. The bank’s new climate
policy has been appreciated by many of its clients, and also attracted new clients. Nordea needs to
take the same steps to remain competitive in the Nordic market where sustainability issues is a
growing business risk and opportunity.
Nordea's continued support of expanding fossil fuel companies that lack robust transition plans
violates the bank’s own climate commitments to contribute to the fulfilment of the Paris Agreement.
By strengthening its overall climate strategy and its financing requirements, Nordea could become
part of the solution to the climate crisis instead of being part of the problem.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
CaixaBank Asset Management Against

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.