Sherwin-Williams Co. | Assess biodiversity impacts and dependencies at Sherwin-Williams Co.

Status
Omitted
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
SHW
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Biodiversity / nature
  • Climate change
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the Board of Directors issue a public report, within six months, assessing the benefits and drawbacks of permanently committing not to sell paint containing titanium dioxide sourced from the Okefenokee, and assessing risks to the company associated with same.
Whereas clause
Mining next to ecologically sensitive protected areas poses material climate, regulatory and reputational risks.

At 438,000 acres, the Okefenokee Swamp is one of the world’s largest freshwater wetlands. Over 402,000 acres are protected in the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, the largest refuge in the eastern United States and home to hundreds of plant and animal species. The Okefenokee also stores over 400M tons of CO2 equivalent, making it one of the largest natural carbon sinks in North America.

Twin Pines Minerals, LLC (TPM) has applied for permits to mine titanium on Trail Ridge, the swamp’s eastern hydrologic boundary, for production of titanium dioxide. TPM’s northern neighbor has publicly called for mining on its land and TPM’s new western neighbor has leased its land for titanium mining elsewhere in Georgia.

As Sherwin-Williams is a major carrier of titanium dioxide-based paint, links between the company’s paint products and titanium mined on Trail Ridge could expose the company to unnecessary risks:

Climate: Overwhelming scientific consensus states that TPM’s project would significantly damage the Okefenokee by drawing down its water level and increasing risk of drought and landscape-level fires. Such events would destroy wildlife habitat, damage thousands of acres of adjacent private timberland and release significant carbon emissions. Sherwin-Williams’ Scope 3 emissions could skyrocket in the event of a major peat fire, as the carbon stored in the Okefenokee is equivalent to over 1,200 percent of the Company’s 2022 Scope 3 emissions. Any link to mining at the Okefenokee would conflict with Sherwin-Williams’ efforts to leverage its ‘Sustainability by Design’ program to reduce Scope 3 emissions and mitigate environmental risks, all while exacerbating the business performance risks associated with climate change.
Regulatory and Legal: The 2023 Okefenokee Protection Act, which would prohibit mining on Trail Ridge, garnered 96 bipartisan cosponsors in Georgia’s House of Representatives and will return in 2024, presenting regulatory risk. Furthermore, organizations with a history of litigating to protect natural resources have publicly criticized the project, and potential litigation from timber companies suffering fire damage to their assets presents additional legal risk.
Reputational: In early 2023, over 100,000 comments were submitted to Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division opposing TPM’s draft Mining Land Use Plan and approximately 70% of Georgians want Governor Kemp to deny TPM’s permits. Okefenokee is being nominated for inclusion on UNESCO’s World Heritage Site List, and the issue has received significant media coverage in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, AP and Bloomberg.
A commitment to avoid sourcing titanium dioxide from the Okefenokee would help Sherwin-Williams realize the aspiration in its 2022 Sustainability Report to “maintain a supply chain in which continuous improvement and sustainability principles are at the forefront.”

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.