SkyWest, Inc. | Respect for freedom of association and collective bargaining at SkyWest Inc

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Lead filer
As You Sow
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board adopt and disclose a Non-Interference Policy upholding the rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining in its operations, as reflected in the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Freedom of association and collective bargaining are fundamental human rights under internationally recognized human rights frameworks. According to the International Labour Organization (ILO), “Freedom of association refers to the right of workers . . . to create and join organizations of their choice freely and without fear of reprisal or interference.”[1]

In 2023, the United States saw a “revival of union power” leading to significant changes in employee contracts in multiple industries.[2] As investor and public expectations for companies to respect fundamental labor rights continue to grow, an increasing number of companies have taken meaningful steps to strengthen their policies and practices, including Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, American Airlines, and JetBlue.

SkyWest, Inc. is reliant on a domestic workforce and customer base. However, the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA has alleged that SkyWest retaliated against employees seeking union representation and funds an internal employee association, the SkyWest Inflight Association (SIA), intended to replace independent unionization.[3] This is at odds with the ILO’s ethos of independent bargaining and non-interference. A case has been filed alleging that SIA is an illegal ‘dummy union.’[4]

Should SkyWest’s brand be linked to anti-union rhetoric, it risks losing customers. A recent Gallup poll found that American approval of unions is higher than it has been in over 50 years.[5] Controversy over SIA has already led to negative publicity for the Company, including Senator Bernie Sanders tweeting: “Creating company unions are an illegal union busting tactic. Follow the law!”[6]

Moreover, the presence of unions has been positively correlated with low turnover, improved diversity, investment in training, and reduced legal and regulatory violations.[7] Conversely, companies that actively oppose unionization experience declines in productivity relative to those that are less opposed; “the overall negative effects are driven by manager’s or owner’s dislike of working with unions rather than economic costs of unions.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: The Policy should contain commitments to:

Non-interference when employees exercise their right to form or join a trade union, including

prohibiting SkyWest from undermining this right or pressuring employees seeking to form or join a company-hosted organization intended to represent employees;

Good faith and timely collective bargaining if employees form or join a trade union;

Where national or local law is silent or differs from international human rights standards, following the higher standard; and

Processes to identify, prevent, account for, and remedy any practices that violate or are inconsistent with the Policy.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.