Submitted by John Chevedden

Supporting Statement

As a long-term shareholder of Lennar, I support transparency and accountability in corporate electoral spending. This includes any activity considered intervention in a political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations, and independent expenditures or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state, or local candidates.

A company’s reputation, value, and bottom line can be adversely impacted by political spending. The risk is especially serious when giving to trade associations, Super PACs, 527 committees, and “social welfare” organizations - groups that routinely pass money to or spend on behalf of candidates and political causes that a company might not otherwise wish to support.

The Conference Board’s 2021 “Under a Microscope” report details these risks, recommends the process suggested in this proposal, and warns “a new era of stakeholder scrutiny, social media, and political polarization has propelled corporate political activity - and the risks that come with it - into the spotlight. Political activity can pose increasingly significant risks for companies, including the perception that political contributions—and other forms of activity- are at odds with core company values.”

Publicly available records show Lennar has contributed nearly $4 million in corporate funds since the 2016 election cycle.

This proposal asks Lennar to disclose all of its electoral spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations which may be used for electoral purposes - and are otherwise undisclosed. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies, including Yum Brands Inc., Ulta Beauty Inc., and Ralph Lauren Corp., which present this information on their websites.

Without knowing the recipients of our company’s political dollars shareholders cannot sufficiently assess whether our company’s election-related spending aligns or conflicts with its policies on climate change and sustainability, or other areas of concern. Please support this important governance reform.