L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Lobbying Expenditures Disclosure at L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
LHX
Lead filer
Individual
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED, the shareholders of L3Harris request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:
1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2. Payments by L3Harris used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3. L3Harris’ membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.
4. Description of management’s and the Board’s decision-making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.
For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which L3Harris is a member.
Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.
The report shall be presented to the Nominating and Governance Committee and posted on L3Harris’ website.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Full disclosure of L3Harris’ lobbying activities and expenditures is needed to assess whether its lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and shareholder interests. L3Harris spent $50,251,673 from 2010 – 2022 on federal lobbying. This does not include state lobbying expenditures, where L3Harris also lobbies but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, L3Harris’ lobbying over first responder communication systems in Florida has drawn media attention.1
Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying and undisclosed grassroots activity, and these groups may be spending “at least double what’s publicly reported.”2 Unlike many of its peers, L3Harris fails to disclose its payments to trade associations and social welfare groups (SWGs), or the amounts used for lobbying, to shareholders. L3Harris belongs to the Business Roundtable, which has spent over $380 million on federal lobbying since 1998. L3Harris’ current disclosure leaves out trade associations that lobby like the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, Information Technology Industry Council and Telecommunications Industry Association, and all SWGs.
L3Harris’ lack of disclosure presents reputational risks when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, L3Harris believes in addressing climate change, yet the Business Roundtable lobbied against the Inflation Reduction Act.3 L3Harris’ lobbying to get Israeli hacking firm NSO removed from a Commerce Department blacklist has attracted scrutiny.4 And while our company notes the “U.S. Government’s budget deficit and the national debt” as a business risk in its 2022 annual report, the Business Roundtable has lobbied against a new minimum corporate tax.5
Reputational damage stemming from these misalignments could harm shareholder value. L3Harris should expand its lobbying disclosure.
1 https://floridapolitics.com/archives/498902-lobbying-compensation-corcoran-partners-nears-6m-in-2021-pay/.
2 https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-publicly-reported/.
3 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/19/top-us-business-lobby-group-climate-action-business-roundtable.
4 https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/us/politics/nso-contract-us-spy.html.
5 https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/08/14/biden-corporate-tax/.

Filed by John Chevedden

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
VidaCaixa For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.