Meta (FACEBOOK, INC.) | Report on Political Advertising and Election Cycle Enhanced Actions

3.05% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
Resolution details
Company ticker
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board prepare a publicly available report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary and privileged information, to assess the benefits and drawbacks to our Company of: (1) prohibiting all political advertising on its platforms and (2) restoring the type of enhanced actions put in place during the 2020 election cycle to reduce the platform’s amplification of false and divisive information.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: As reported in August 2023, Meta considered prohibiting all political advertising, only to reverse course to remain competitive with X (formerly Twitter).1 The X platform is increasingly a haven for allowing and protecting hate speech.2 X’sapproach is a financial failure, with X having lost more than half its value in just one year.3
Social media platforms like Facebook are increasingly used to promote specific causes or political candidates, influence voting patterns, and target individuals based on their political beliefs.4 Campaigns often buy or sell users’ data for targeted advertising and finely honed personalized messages.5
According to a Pew Research Center survey, more than half of U.S. adults say social media companies should not allow any political advertisements on their platforms.6 A larger share (77%) find it “not very” or “not at all acceptable” for platforms to sell data about their users’ online activities so users can then be targeted with political campaignads.7
In addition to invading users’ privacy, “microtargeted” ads are often sources of fake news or misinformation—including intentional disinformation.8 Reporting has described how foreign operatives “worked off evolving lists of racial, religious, political, and economic themes. They used these lists to create pages, write posts, and craft ads that would appear in users’ news feeds—with the apparent goal of appealing to one audience and alienating another.”9 All of this is enabled by the targeting power and data collection practices of social media platforms like Facebook that financially depend on selling advertising.
After shareholder and public engagement on this issue in the run up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Meta successfully altered algorithms and took other actions to de-prioritize extremist postings and to instead emphasize mainstream news content.10 After the election, and despite promised plans to “evaluate” partner and content monetization policies, and the effectiveness of brand safety controls available to advertisers,11 it now appears Meta has eliminated the successful pre-election systems.12
Selling targeted political ads and abandoning successful “enhanced actions” to halt amplification of false and misleading information is a material risk for shareholders. Concern is growing that Meta is following X into a massive loss of valuation.
Supporting statement

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Rothschild & co Asset Management For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.