Berry Global | Climate Transition Plan and Long-Term Targets at Berry Corporation

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
BERY
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Materials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Berry produce a report within a year, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, that discloses near- and long-term operational (scope 1 and 2) GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s goal of maintaining global temperature rise at 1.5 degrees Celsius. The report should be released yearly to provide updates on progress toward these targets, as well as any revisions to the goals.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: In its 2023 synthesis report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reiterates the urgent need for near-term action to limit global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius. The report echoes the IPCC's 2018 findings that achieving a 45 percent reduction in net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050 is essential to avert the worst impacts of climate change.
The urgency of this message is underscored by the IPCC's 2021 data, which projects that without decisive action, we can expect increases in global temperatures, sea levels, extreme weather events, forest fires, and agricultural losses. Such environmental shifts could exacerbate risks for investors and companies, including disruptions in supply chains, reduced resource availability, lost productivity, and increased commodity price volatility. These factors could necessitate new regulations and transition costs, further impacting businesses.
Oil and gas companies face heightened climate-related vulnerabilities. Companies like Antero, California Resources or Hess have committed to net zero and set short- or medium-term emissions reduction targets. Companies responsible for nearly 40 percent of global oil and gas production, including APA, Civitas, Coterra and Devon, have joined the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 and set methane emissions reduction targets. Increasingly, companies that do not adequately manage greenhouse gas emissions risk their reputation and license to operate.
Despite committing to setting a scopes 1 and 2 reduction target in 2022, Berry has not set any target nor committed to aligning with a 1.5 degree Celsius scenario, and fails to address scope 3 emissions from its supply chain and product usage. More ambitious action is imperative to comprehensively manage the company's climate-related risks.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT:
In assessing targets, we recommend, at management’s discretion:
- Pursuing alignment with internationally recognized 1.5 degree aligned pathways such as those outlined by the IPCC or International Energy Agency;
- Considering resources from advisory groups such as such as Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, Transition Plan Taskforce, Transition Pathway Initiative, Climate Action 100+, and the IIGCC Net Zero Standard for Oil and Gas;
- Considering setting additional targets for methane emissions, flaring, renewable energy, energy efficiency, alternative fuels production and other measures deemed appropriate by management; and
- Committing to reduce local community health impacts from cumulative operational emissions.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.