Exxon Mobil Corporation | Report on Guyana Oil Spill Economic, Human and Environmental Impacts

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
XOM
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Company issue a report evaluating the economic, human, and environmental impacts of a worst-case oil spill from its operations offshore of Guyana. The report should be prepared at reasonable expense, omit proprietary or privileged information, and clarify the extent of the Company’s cleanup response commitments given the potential for severe impact on Caribbean economies.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS:
ExxonMobil operates one of the largest oil plays discovered in the past decade, offshore of Guyana. Production began in 2019, 1 with capacity expected to exceed one million bpd by 2030.2
ExxonMobil is exceeding its safety thresholds for production in two offshore projects in Guyana.3 Production in one project has surpassed 150,000 bpd,4 clearly above the listed peak production safety threshold of 120,000 bpd and the “potential peak production volume of 144,000 bpd” used for calculating impacts in ExxonMobil’s 2018 environmental impact assessment (EIA),5 raising concerns among observers.6 The August 2023 cumulative impact assessment for the Starbroek block merely recycles information from the original EIA7 despite significant increases in safety thresholds for that project, making its calculations vast underestimates. A former director of Guyana’s environmental protection agency called this increased production “unheard of” and stated ExxonMobil is “without a conscience and ruthlessly taking advantage of an abysmal EPA and weak Government” in Guyana.8
ExxonMobil’s assessments do not account for the increased risk of a spill with wells operating above safety thresholds, for an extended oil release similar to the BP Macondo disaster, or for severe weather conditions beyond historic trends due to climate change.
Despite claiming substantial implementation of this proposal last year, ExxonMobil has not conducted an analysis of the potential economic costs of an oil spill.9 Caribbean countries in a potential spill zone rely on tourism and fishing industries to support their economies,10 yet ExxonMobil characterizes risk to the economy and employment as minor and assumes that a large oil spill is unlikely.11
However, Robert Bea, an expert on the Macondo spill, warns ExxonMobil shows “ignorance of risk management fundamentals” in its Guyana operations and mirrors BP’s overconfidence preceding the Macondo disaster.12 The most severe spill scenario in ExxonMobil’s EIA accounts for only a 30-day spill.13 The Macondo spill released millions of barrels of oil, covering thousands of miles of the Gulf of Mexico, over 87 days.14 BP stock plummeted 52% over two months.15
ExxonMobil’s responsibility and potential liability for its Guyana operations are of great concern to investors 
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement:
A “worst-case” should use adverse assumptions such as an extended duration of an uncontrolled release from multiple wells similar to the BP spill, severe weather conditions, and risks from operating beyond the safety thresholds in the EIA.
1 https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/news/newsroom/news-releases/2022/0211_exxonmobil-starts-production-at-guyanas-second-offshore-development 
2 https://newsroom.gy/2022/10/26/with-new-discoveries-oil-production-to-exceed-1-million-barrels-per-day-by-2030/ ;
3 https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2022/10/28/exxonmobil-xom-q3-2022-earnings-call-transcript/ 
4 https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2023/09/12/exxonmobil-to-increase-production-at-liza-one-and-two-govt-reveals/ 
5 Liza Phase 1 EIA, p.38 
6 https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2022/11/01/exxonmobil-ruthlessly-taking-advantage-of-slack-govt-abysmal-epa-by-violating-safe-production-limits-dr-adams/ 
7 Whiptail EIA, p. 1242
8 https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2022/11/01/exxonmobil-ruthlessly-taking-advantage-of-slack-govt-abysmal-epa-by-violating-safe-production-limits-dr-adams/ 
9 https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2023/09/13/exxonmobil-never-examined-cost-of-an-oil-spill-to-guyana-caribbean-nations-public-meeting-on-6th-project-hears/ 
10 https://www.fao.org/3/ax904e/ax904e.pdf 
11 Payara EIA, Volume I, p. 1,002.
12 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/17/exxon-oil-drilling-guyana-disaster-risk 
13 Payara EIA, Volume I, p. 839 
14 https://www.britannica.com/event/Deepwater-Horizon-oil-spill ; See also, https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/deepwater-horizon-bp-gulf-mexico-oil-spill#:~:text=4%20million%20barrels%20of%20oil,be%20responsible%20for%20the%20spill 
15 https://money.cnn.com/2010/06/24/news/companies/BP_stock_price/index.htm 

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.